# Yocoolab > Pin comments directly on your running product, and send any element to Claude Code, Cursor or your own agent with full context. No fake canvas, no handoff docs, no viewer seat fees. Yocoolab is a browser extension plus a shared dashboard for giving feedback on a web product while it is running. You click an element on any live URL — localhost, staging or production — and leave a comment pinned to that element. The comment captures the element, its selector, a screenshot and the page URL, and becomes a thread your team and your AI coding agent can both read. Threads can be routed to an AI agent over MCP (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Roo, Windsurf, Copilot), which can reply with a root cause and a proposed fix or open a pull request, or to Jira, Linear, Slack, GitHub and Telegram. Yocoolab is free in beta: unlimited collaborators, unlimited repositories, no seat fees for viewers. Pricing after beta has not been set. --- # Comparisons — how Yocoolab differs from other feedback tools ## Figma Alternative for Live Product Feedback — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/figma-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ The Figma Alternative The Figma alternative that lives where your product does. Figma is a fake canvas. Your product is a real browser. Yocoolab lets your whole team review, annotate, and collaborate directly on the live app — no mockups, no seat fees, no handoff. $175+/mo for Figma with 20 dev viewers → Free on Yocoolab in beta. Viewers included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are leaving Figma The 2024 pricing change was the last straw for thousands of teams. 9× Cost increase Teams reported 9× price increases after Figma's 2024 dev viewer seat pricing change. 47% Considering leaving Of Figma users surveyed by CreativeBloq in 2024 were actively considering switching. $5/mo Per dev viewer What Figma charges per developer who just wants to look at designs. Every month. 3.7/5 Satisfaction drop Figma's satisfaction score fell from 4.2 → 3.7 between 2023 and 2025 (UXTools survey). "We got our Figma renewal quote. $540/month for 3 editors and 12 dev viewers. Previously we paid $60/month. That's a 9× increase. Starting migration this week." — Engineering lead on Hacker News, September 2024 The fundamental difference Every other Figma alternative is still a canvas. Yocoolab isn't competing on the canvas — it replaces the canvas entirely. Figma (and every alternative) You design a mockup that approximates your product Devs implement it — it never matches exactly Reviewers comment on the mockup, not the real thing Feedback goes stale the moment code ships Every dev viewer pays $5/month just to look Clients need a Figma account to leave feedback You end up with a canvas, Jira tickets, Slack threads, and reality — all different Yocoolab Your team reviews directly on the deployed, live product Comments are pinned to real elements — not mockups Feedback never goes stale — it lives on the actual URL Devs get CSS selectors, DOM paths, and source mapping automatically Every viewer included in beta — engineers, clients, stakeholders Send any element to Agentic Harness, OpenClaw, Hermes, Claude Code, or Codex for an instant fix + PR One layer replaces: Figma reviews, Loom screencaps, Slack confusion Full feature comparison Feature Figma Yocoolab Workflow Review feedback on the live, deployed product No fake canvas — works on real browser URLs Pin comments on any element with pixel precision Auto-captures screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (selector, styles, DOM path) Branch/PR-level review tracking Works on localhost, staging, and production Pricing Dev viewer seats free Stakeholder / client access free Transparent pricing (no seat surprises) Viewer access without account required No price increases since 2022 Integrations Jira integration (bidirectional) Linear integration Slack real-time notifications GitHub PR auto-linking AI agent integration (Agentic Harness, OpenClaw, Hermes, Claude Code, Codex) — element → fix → PR Telegram notifications AI & Automation Send element to AI with full context AI generates PR from feedback Auto-detect React, Vue, Svelte frameworks AI layout / rename suggestions ( Figma AI (limited) ) The bill your team is actually paying Figma Figma's per-seat pricing adds up fast. Especially when every dev viewer costs $5/month. Team scenario Figma Yocoolab 3 editors only $45/mo Free 5 editors + 20 dev viewers $175/mo Free 10 editors + 30 dev viewers + 10 clients $450/mo Free Enterprise 50+ users $75+/editor Free Figma pricing based on Professional plan ($15/editor) + Dev Mode viewer seats ($5/viewer). Accurate as of 2025. Ready to review on the real thing? Install the Chrome Extension and start pinning feedback on your live app in under 2 minutes. Every viewer included in beta. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Is Yocoolab a replacement for Figma? Not for drawing. Figma is where the design gets made; Yocoolab is where it gets reviewed once it is real. If your team is still exploring visual directions, keep using a design tool. If the argument you keep having is about the product that already exists in the browser, that conversation belongs on the live app, not on a canvas that no longer matches it. Why review on the live app instead of the design file? Because the design file stops being the truth the moment the code ships. Real spacing, real copy, real data, real breakpoints and real loading states only exist in the running product. Feedback pinned there needs no translation step — the element being discussed is the element that will be changed. What happens to feedback after someone leaves a comment? It stays attached to the element, so anyone opening the thread lands on the exact thing being discussed. From there you can send it to an AI coding agent with the element context, selector, screenshot and full discussion included, so the agent has what it needs to open a fix rather than guessing from a sentence. Can I use Yocoolab and Figma together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Figma keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## BugHerd Alternative — Visual Feedback That Reaches Your Code — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/bugherd-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ BugHerd Alternative A free BugHerd alternative that fixes bugs with AI. BugHerd lets you report bugs. Yocoolab reports them AND fixes them — with AI that reads the element context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $39/user/month on BugHerd → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from BugHerd BugHerd is a solid tool for reporting bugs. But reporting is only half the job. $39 Per user / month BugHerd starts at $39/user/month. A 10-person team pays $390/month minimum. 0 AI features BugHerd has no AI capabilities. Feedback must be fixed manually by developers. 3.8/5 G2 Rating Users report slow UI and outdated interface in recent G2 reviews. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Unlimited users, unlimited projects, unlimited feedback. Report bugs vs. Report + Fix bugs BugHerd stops at reporting. Yocoolab connects feedback directly to code — with AI that writes the fix. BugHerd Find a bug → screenshot → write description → assign to dev Dev opens the ticket, finds the element in code manually No source mapping — dev must locate the CSS selector themselves No AI assistance — every fix is manual Every team member costs $39/month Clients and stakeholders need paid seats to report bugs Bug report → Jira ticket → Slack thread → PR — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, stakeholders, QA Guests can comment without creating an account One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature BugHerd Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Pin feedback directly on live web pages Auto-captures annotated screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing No price increases in 2+ years ( BugHerd raised prices 2023 ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Automated screenshot annotation Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Telegram notifications Asana / Trello / Monday.com ( Coming soon ) What BugHerd actually costs your team BugHerd charges per user. Every stakeholder, client, and QA tester adds to the bill. Team scenario BugHerd Yocoolab Solo developer $39/mo Free Small team (5 users) $195/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $585/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free BugHerd pricing based on Standard plan ($39/user/month). Accurate as of 2025. Ready to go from reporting bugs to fixing them automatically? Install the Chrome Extension. Start pinning feedback. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. How is Yocoolab different from a visual bug tracker? A bug tracker ends at a well-described ticket. Yocoolab treats the ticket as the middle of the process, not the end: the same pin that captured the problem can be handed to a coding agent with the element and discussion attached, so the next artifact is a proposed fix rather than another item in a queue. Does it capture technical context automatically? Yes. Pinning an element captures where it is in the page — the selector and surrounding DOM context — along with a screenshot and the page URL, so a developer or an agent can find it again without a "third card, second row" description. Can non-technical teammates use it? That is the point. Reviewers click the thing they mean and type a sentence; the technical context is captured for them. Nobody has to learn a selector or open developer tools to file something useful. Can I use Yocoolab and BugHerd together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. BugHerd keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Marker.io Alternative for AI-Assisted Bug Reports — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/marker-io-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ Marker.io Alternative A free Marker.io alternative that fixes bugs with AI. Marker.io captures visual feedback well. Yocoolab captures it AND fixes it — with AI that reads the element context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $49/month minimum on Marker.io → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from Marker.io Marker.io is a solid visual feedback tool. But feedback without automatic fixes leaves a bottleneck. $49 Per month minimum Marker.io starts at $49/month for the Starter plan. A 10-person team pays $490/month minimum. $0 AI features Marker.io has no AI code-fix capabilities. Every bug must be fixed manually by developers. 4.5/5 G2 Rating Marker.io has solid reviews but users report the pricing model scales poorly for agencies with many clients. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Unlimited users, unlimited projects, unlimited feedback. AI fixes included. Capture feedback vs. Capture + Auto-fix Marker.io captures bugs. Yocoolab captures them AND generates the code fix — with AI that writes the PR. Marker.io Pin a bug → screenshot + browser metadata captured Dev opens ticket, finds the element in code manually No source mapping — dev must locate CSS selector themselves No AI code generation — every fix is manual Starts at $49/month — every team member adds cost Clients and stakeholders need paid guest seats Bug report → Jira ticket → dev queue — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, QA, stakeholders Guests can comment without creating an account — no paid seats One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature Marker.io Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Pin feedback directly on live web pages Auto-captures annotated screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing Starts at $49/month ( Yocoolab: Free ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Trello integration ( Coming soon ) Asana integration ( Coming soon ) Telegram notifications GitLab integration ( On roadmap ) What Marker.io actually costs your team Marker.io charges per user. Every stakeholder, client, and QA tester adds to the bill. Team scenario Marker.io Yocoolab Solo developer $49/mo Free Small team (5 users) $245/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $735/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free Marker.io pricing based on Starter plan ($49/month). Accurate as of 2025. Ready to capture bugs AND fix them automatically? Install the Chrome Extension. Start pinning feedback. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Does Yocoolab create issues in Jira or Linear? Yes — threads can flow into Jira and Linear with the element context and screenshot attached, and Slack or Telegram can carry the activity. The difference is that the issue is not the finish line: the same thread can go to a coding agent that opens the actual change. Do I need to install anything in my app? No. Yocoolab runs as a browser extension over your existing site, so there is no snippet or SDK to add and nothing to redeploy. That also means you can use it on staging, on a preview deployment, or on production without shipping anything first. What does the AI agent actually receive? The element that was pinned, its selector and surrounding context, the screenshot, the page URL and the whole human discussion on the thread. Agents fail on visual work mostly because they cannot see what was meant — this closes that gap before the agent starts. Can I use Yocoolab and Marker.io together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Marker.io keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Pastel Alternative — Website Review With Agent Handoff — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/pastel-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ Pastel Alternative A free Pastel alternative that reviews live apps, not stale screenshots. Pastel is great for annotating static mockups. Yocoolab lets you pin feedback directly on your running web application — with AI that reads the code context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $29/month minimum on Pastel → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from Pastel Pastel is a solid canvas-based review tool. But screenshots get stale — and annotations have zero connection to your code. Screenshots Stale snapshots Pastel works on static screenshots. By the time feedback arrives, the live app has already changed. $29 Per month minimum Pastel starts at $29/month for Solo. A 5-person team pays $99/month. Every collaborator adds cost. 0 Code context Pastel annotations have no connection to your actual codebase. Developers must hunt for elements manually. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Pin feedback on live apps, get AI-powered code fixes, unlimited users included. Static screenshots vs. Live-app feedback Pastel annotates screenshots. Yocoolab annotates your actual running code — with AI that writes the fix. Pastel Take a screenshot → annotate the static image Screenshot is frozen in time — app may have changed No source mapping — dev must find the element manually No AI code generation — every fix is manual Starts at $29/month — every collaborator adds cost Clients and stakeholders need paid seats Feedback → ticket → dev queue — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element in your live app → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Feedback is always against the current live version — never stale Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, QA, stakeholders One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature Pastel Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Comment directly on live web pages Annotate static screenshots/mockups Auto-captures screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Design handoff with developer context Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing Starts at $29/month ( Yocoolab: Free ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Version history for design iterations ( Coming soon ) Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Figma plugin ( Planned ) Telegram notifications Asana integration ( Coming soon ) Webhook/API access What Pastel actually costs your team Pastel charges per seat. Every designer, client, and stakeholder adds to the bill. Team scenario Pastel Yocoolab Solo developer $29/mo Free Small team (5 users) $99/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $198/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free Pastel pricing based on Solo ($29/month) and Team ($99/month) plans. Accurate as of 2025. Stop reviewing stale screenshots. Start fixing live apps. Install the Chrome Extension. Pin feedback on your running app. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Can clients and stakeholders comment without an account hassle? Review is meant to be the low-friction part. The whole model is built so the person with the opinion can point at the thing and say the thing, without a seat being purchased for them or a tool being learned first. Does it work on any website, or only on ones I own? It works on the live web pages you point it at, because it runs in the browser rather than inside your codebase. Teams typically use it on their own staging and production URLs, and on preview deployments during review. What happens after the review round is approved? Threads carry a workflow stage, so a round of feedback can move from raised to in progress to in review without being retyped somewhere else. When a change is needed, the thread itself can be sent to a coding agent with the context attached. Can I use Yocoolab and Pastel together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Pastel keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## ruttl Alternative for Live Website Feedback — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/ruttl-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ Ruttl Alternative A free Ruttl alternative that collaborates on live websites with AI-powered code fixes. Ruttl is great for live website collaboration. Yocoolab takes it further: pin feedback on your running web application — with AI that reads the code context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $8/month minimum on Ruttl → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from Ruttl Ruttl is a solid live website collaboration tool. But it stops at feedback — and annotations have zero connection to your code. $8 Per user/month Ruttl's free plan is limited to 1 project. Add team members and costs multiply — every collaborator adds $8/month. 0 AI code fixes Ruttl shows you bugs and feedback — but you still have to code every fix manually. Yocoolab AI reads the element context and opens a PR. Live App annotation Ruttl annotates websites. Yocoolab captures DOM paths, CSS selectors, and framework context so developers never hunt for elements. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is completely free. Unlimited projects, unlimited users, AI-powered code fixes — all included. Live website feedback vs. AI-powered code fixes Ruttl gathers live feedback. Yocoolab gathers feedback AND writes the code fix automatically — with AI that writes the fix. Ruttl Take a screenshot → annotate the static image Screenshot is frozen in time — app may have changed No source mapping — dev must find the element manually No AI code generation — every fix is manual Starts at $29/month — every collaborator adds cost No Chrome Extension — must use their dashboard Feedback → ticket → dev queue — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element in your live app → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Feedback is always against the current live version — never stale Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, QA, stakeholders One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature Ruttl Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Comment directly on live web pages Edit live website text inline ( Planned ) Auto-captures screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items AI-powered code fixes from feedback Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing Starts at $8/month ( Yocoolab: Free ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Version history for design iterations ( Coming soon ) Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Figma plugin ( Planned ) Telegram notifications Asana integration ( Both: Coming soon ) Webhook/API access What Ruttl actually costs your team Ruttl charges per user. Every team member adds $8/month to the bill. Team scenario Ruttl Yocoolab Solo developer $8/mo Free Small team (5 users) $40/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $120/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free Ruttl pricing based on public plans ($8/user/month). Accurate as of 2025. Stop gathering feedback without fixes. Ship code automatically. Install the Chrome Extension. Pin feedback on your running app. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Can I edit the page content directly? Yocoolab is deliberately about the decision, not about producing a throwaway visual edit. You pin what is wrong, the team argues it out in one place, and then the actual change is made in the codebase — by a person or by an agent working from that thread — so what you approve is what ships. Is it real-time when several people review at once? Yes. Presence and live cursors mean you can see who else is on the page, and comments and replies land for everyone without a refresh, so a review call does not turn into "did you get my message". Does the feedback survive a deploy? Threads are anchored to the element and page, so they persist as a record of the conversation rather than vanishing with the session. The discussion history is what makes the eventual handoff to an agent or a developer useful. Can I use Yocoolab and ruttl together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. ruttl keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Markup.io Alternative — Feedback That Becomes Code — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/markup-io-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ MarkUp.io Alternative A free MarkUp.io alternative that pins feedback on live apps with code-level precision. MarkUp.io is great for visual commenting on live websites. Yocoolab goes beyond: pin feedback on your running web application — with AI that reads the code context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $25/month on MarkUp.io Pro → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from MarkUp.io MarkUp.io is a solid visual commenting tool. But pins have no code context — and annotations have zero connection to your code. $25 Per month minimum MarkUp.io Pro starts at $25/month. The free plan limits you to 1 project — every additional project adds cost. 0 Code context MarkUp.io pins have no connection to your actual codebase. Developers must hunt for elements manually. 1 Free project only MarkUp.io free tier restricts you to a single project. Yocoolab gives unlimited projects, unlimited users — free. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Unlimited projects, unlimited users, AI-powered code fixes from live element context. Visual commenting vs. Code-aware feedback MarkUp.io adds visual pins. Yocoolab adds visual pins WITH code context and AI that writes the fix — with AI that writes the fix. MarkUp.io Take a screenshot → annotate the static image Screenshot is frozen in time — app may have changed No source mapping — dev must find the element manually No AI code generation — every fix is manual Starts at $29/month — every collaborator adds cost No Chrome Extension — pinned to their platform Feedback → ticket → dev queue — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element in your live app → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Feedback is always against the current live version — never stale Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, QA, stakeholders One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature MarkUp.io Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Comment directly on live web pages Visual pin-and-comment on any element Auto-captures screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Design handoff with developer context Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing Starts at $25/month (Pro) ( Yocoolab: Free ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Version history for design iterations ( Coming soon ) Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Figma plugin ( Both: N/A ) Telegram notifications Zapier/Integromat ( Planned ) Webhook/API access What MarkUp.io actually costs your team MarkUp.io charges per project. Every additional project adds to the cost. Team scenario MarkUp.io Yocoolab Solo developer $25/mo Free Small team (5 users) $125/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $375/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free MarkUp.io pricing based on public plans. Accurate as of 2025. Stop just pinning feedback. Start shipping code fixes automatically. Install the Chrome Extension. Pin feedback on your running app. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. What is the difference between annotating and what Yocoolab does? Annotation captures intent; it still leaves someone to translate that intent into a change. Yocoolab keeps the annotation attached to the real element and then routes it — with the selector, screenshot and discussion — to whoever or whatever is going to implement it, including an AI coding agent. Can I use it during a live review meeting? Yes. Multiple people can be on the same page at once with live cursors and presence, so pins and replies show up for everyone as they happen instead of being collected afterwards. Where do the comments live? In threads tied to the project and the page, visible both in the extension on the live site and in the dashboard, with a board view for tracking what is raised, in progress and in review. Can I use Yocoolab and Markup.io together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Markup.io keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## zipBoard Alternative for Product & Design Review — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/zipboard-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ zipBoard Alternative A free zipBoard alternative that reviews live apps with AI that writes the code fixes. zipBoard is great for visual bug tracking. Yocoolab gives you the same visual review \u2014 plus AI that reads the code context — with AI that reads the code context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $99/month on zipBoard → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from zipBoard zipBoard is a solid visual bug tracking tool. But there's no free tier — and annotations have zero connection to your code. $99 Starting price zipBoard starts at $99/month. No free plan. Yocoolab is completely free — unlimited projects, unlimited users. 0 Code context zipBoard captures screenshots and videos — but no DOM paths, CSS selectors, or source mapping. Developers hunt manually. AI No code fixes zipBoard identifies bugs visually. Yocoolab identifies bugs AND uses AI to write the code fix and open a PR. $0 Yocoolab cost Free in beta. AI-powered code fixes, unlimited projects, unlimited users — everything zipBoard charges $99+ for. Visual bug tracking vs. AI-powered code fixes zipBoard tracks bugs visually. Yocoolab tracks bugs AND writes the code fix automatically — with AI that writes the fix. zipBoard Take a screenshot → annotate the static image Screenshot is frozen in time — app may have changed No source mapping — dev must find the element manually No AI code generation — every fix is manual Starts at $29/month — every collaborator adds cost Built for eLearning/SCORM — web app support is secondary Feedback → ticket → dev queue — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element in your live app → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Feedback is always against the current live version — never stale Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, QA, stakeholders One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature zipBoard Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Comment directly on live web pages Screenshot/video annotation Auto-captures screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items eLearning/SCORM review ( Web apps only ) Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing Starts at $99/month ( Yocoolab: Free ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Version history for design iterations ( Coming soon ) Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Figma plugin ( Both: N/A ) Telegram notifications Trello/Asana ( Coming soon ) Webhook/API access What zipBoard actually costs your team zipBoard starts at $99/month with no free tier. Every user adds to the cost. Team scenario zipBoard Yocoolab Solo developer $99/mo Free Small team (5 users) $99/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $249/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free zipBoard pricing based on public plans. Accurate as of 2025. Stop paying $99/month for bug tracking. Get AI-powered fixes for free. Install the Chrome Extension. Pin feedback on your running app. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Does Yocoolab handle review workflow, not just comments? Yes. Threads carry a stage, so work moves across a board from raised through in progress to in review, and the same thread is the unit that gets sent to an agent or into Jira or Linear. You are not maintaining a comment tool and a tracker in parallel. Can it be used across several projects and sites? Yes — work is organised into projects, each with its own URLs and access, so an agency or a platform team can keep separate products separate while working out of one place. What about controlling who sees what? Projects are private by default, and access is granted per project, so a client or a contractor sees the work they are part of and nothing else. Can I use Yocoolab and zipBoard together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. zipBoard keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Usersnap Alternative — Visual Feedback for AI Teams — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/usersnap-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ Usersnap Alternative A free Usersnap alternative that captures user feedback with AI that writes the code fix. Usersnap is great for capturing user feedback with annotated screenshots. Yocoolab does the same \u2014 plus AI reads the code context — with AI that reads the code context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $19/month on Usersnap → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from Usersnap Usersnap is a solid user feedback tool. But it stops at collecting bugs — and annotations have zero connection to your code. $19 Per user/month Usersnap starts at $19/user/month. A 5-person team pays $95/month. Yocoolab: free in beta for everyone. 0 Code context Usersnap captures screenshots and metadata — but no DOM paths, CSS selectors, or source mapping. Developers still hunt manually. AI No code fixes Usersnap collects feedback. Yocoolab collects feedback AND uses AI to read the element context and open a fix PR automatically. $0 Yocoolab cost Free in beta. Unlimited users, unlimited projects, AI-powered code fixes — no per-seat pricing. User feedback collection vs. AI-powered code fixes Usersnap collects user feedback. Yocoolab collects feedback AND writes the code fix automatically — with AI that writes the fix. Usersnap Take a screenshot → annotate the static image Screenshot is frozen in time — app may have changed No source mapping — dev must find the element manually No AI code generation — every fix is manual Starts at $29/month — every collaborator adds cost No Chrome Extension for developers (widget only) Feedback → ticket → dev queue — fragmented workflow Yocoolab Click on any element in your live app → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Feedback is always against the current live version — never stale Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, QA, stakeholders One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature Usersnap Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Comment directly on live web pages Screenshot annotation with drawing tools Auto-captures screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items User feedback widget (NPS, surveys) ( Planned ) Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing Starts at $19/month ( Yocoolab: Free ) AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Figma plugin ( Both: N/A ) Telegram notifications Zendesk/Intercom ( Planned ) Webhook/API access What Usersnap actually costs your team Usersnap charges per user. Every team member, QA tester, and stakeholder adds $19/month to the bill. Team scenario Usersnap Yocoolab Solo developer $19/mo Free Small team (5 users) $95/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $285/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free Usersnap pricing based on public plans. Accurate as of 2025. Stop just collecting feedback. Start shipping AI-written code fixes for free. Install the Chrome Extension. Pin feedback on your running app. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Is this feedback collection or issue resolution? Both, but the emphasis is resolution. Collecting a screenshot is the easy half. Yocoolab keeps the element, the selector and the conversation together so the report can be handed to a coding agent that opens the fix, instead of stopping at a well-illustrated complaint. Do I need to add a widget to my product? No. It runs as a browser extension over the live page, so there is nothing to embed and nothing to redeploy — which also means you can review a preview deployment before it is ever public. Which AI agents does it work with? You bring your own. Yocoolab connects over MCP, so agents like Claude Code and Cursor can pick up a thread with the full element context attached. Sending to an agent is a deliberate action on a thread, not something that happens to your feedback automatically. Can I use Yocoolab and Usersnap together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Usersnap keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Userback Alternative With AI Agent Handoff — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/userback-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ Userback Alternative A free Userback alternative that fixes feedback with AI. Userback lets you collect visual feedback. Yocoolab collects it AND resolves it — with AI that reads the element context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $29/user/month on Userback → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from Userback Userback is great for collecting feedback. But collecting is only half the job. $29 Per user / month Userback starts at $29/user/month. A 10-person team pays $290/month minimum. 0 AI features Userback has no AI capabilities. Feedback must be fixed manually by developers. 4.5/5 G2 Rating Users like Userback for feedback collection but want automated resolution. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Unlimited users, unlimited projects, unlimited feedback. Collect feedback vs. Collect + Resolve with AI Userback stops at collection. Yocoolab connects feedback directly to code — with AI that writes the fix. Userback Find a bug → screenshot → write description → assign to dev Dev opens the ticket, finds the element in code manually No source mapping — dev must locate the CSS selector themselves No AI assistance — every fix is manual Every team member costs $29/month Clients and stakeholders need paid seats to report bugs Yocoolab Click on any element → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, clients, stakeholders, QA Guests can comment without creating an account One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature Userback Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Pin feedback directly on live web pages Auto-captures annotated screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation Transparent public pricing AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Automated screenshot annotation Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Telegram notifications What Userback actually costs your team Userback charges per user. Every stakeholder, client, and QA tester adds to the bill. Team scenario Userback Yocoolab Solo developer $29/mo Free Small team (5 users) $145/mo Free Agency (15 users + 20 clients) $435/mo Free Enterprise (50+ users) Custom Free Userback pricing based on publicly available plans. Accurate as of 2025. Ready to go from collecting feedback to resolving it automatically? Install the Chrome Extension. Start pinning feedback. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. How does this fit a team already using AI coding agents? It is built for exactly that team. The hard part of pointing an agent at front-end work is telling it precisely which element you mean and what "wrong" means. Yocoolab captures that from the live page and hands it over with the discussion, so the agent starts from evidence. Does feedback have to go through a portal? No. The feedback happens on the product itself — you pin the element you are talking about. Anyone opening the thread later is taken back to that exact spot instead of reading a description of it. Can developers stay in their own tools? Yes. Threads can reach Jira, Linear, Slack or Telegram, and a coding agent can pick the work up directly, so a developer is not required to live in another dashboard to benefit from the context. Can I use Yocoolab and Userback together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Userback keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## UserVoice Alternative for Product Feedback in Context — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/uservoice-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ UserVoice Alternative A free UserVoice alternative that connects feedback to code. UserVoice collects product feedback. Yocoolab collects it AND connects it directly to code — with AI that auto-generates fixes and opens PRs. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $499/month starting on UserVoice → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from UserVoice UserVoice is a feedback forum. Yocoolab is a feedback-to-fix pipeline. $499 Starting price / month UserVoice starts at $499/month — priced for enterprise, out of reach for startups. 0 Code-level feedback UserVoice is a forum for ideas, not a tool for pinning feedback on specific UI elements. 4.2/5 G2 Rating Respected for product feedback management, but teams want faster feedback-to-resolution cycles. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Click on any element, leave feedback, and AI generates the fix. Feedback forum vs. Feedback-to-fix pipeline UserVoice collects votes. Yocoolab collects element context, maps to source code, and auto-fixes with AI. UserVoice Feedback forum for ideas and feature requests — not UI bugs No way to pin feedback directly on a live web page element No element-to-source code mapping for developers No AI-powered code fixes — feedback stays in the forum Starts at $499/month — enterprise pricing model No free plan — out of reach for startups and small teams Voting system for prioritization, not a dev workflow tool Yocoolab Click on any element → auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Feedback is pinned directly on the live web page element Element-to-source code mapping tells dev exactly where to fix AI Companion reads element context and auto-generates fixes Free in beta for everyone — no per-user pricing, unlimited viewers Unlimited projects, unlimited feedback, no credit card required Feedback → AI fix → PR — from forum idea to code fix in one tool Full feature comparison Feature UserVoice Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Pin feedback directly on live web pages Auto-captures annotated screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Automated screenshot annotation Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Telegram notifications What UserVoice actually costs your team UserVoice starts at $499/month for basic feedback collection. AI-powered fixes not included. Team scenario UserVoice Yocoolab Solo developer Not available Free Small team $499/mo Free Mid-size (25+ users) $999+/mo Free Enterprise Custom Free UserVoice pricing based on published plans. Accurate as of 2025. Ready for feedback that goes straight to code? Install the Chrome Extension. Pin feedback on any element. Let AI generate the fix. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Is Yocoolab a product feedback portal? No, and that is the distinction worth understanding before switching. A portal is for collecting and prioritising requests at a distance from the product. Yocoolab is for feedback attached to the interface itself — the screen someone is complaining about — and for turning that into a change quickly. Then when is a portal still the right tool? If your main need is aggregating demand from a large user base, ranking it and reporting on a roadmap, a portal does that job and Yocoolab does not try to. The two solve different problems, and plenty of teams have room for both. What does Yocoolab do better for an internal team? It removes the translation step. Feedback lives on the element, keeps its context, and can be handed to a coding agent or a developer without anyone rewriting it into a ticket first — which is where most of the time and most of the meaning is lost. Can I use Yocoolab and UserVoice together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. UserVoice keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Canny Alternative — Feedback Attached to the Real Product — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/canny-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ Canny Alternative A free Canny alternative that turns feedback into code Canny tracks feature requests. Yocoolab tracks them AND turns them into code — with AI that reads the element context and opens a PR automatically. No per-user pricing. Unlimited free viewers. $400/month starting on Canny → Free in beta on Yocoolab. Every seat included. Install Free — No Seat Fees Or sign in to dashboard → Why teams are switching from Canny Canny is a great feedback board. But boards don't fix bugs or ship features. $400 Starting price / month Canny starts at $400/month — priced for established companies with dedicated product teams. 0 Visual annotation Canny is a text-based feedback board. No screenshots, no element context, no CSS selectors. 4.5/5 G2 Rating Loved for feature request management, but doesn't close the loop from feedback to code. $0 Yocoolab cost Yocoolab is free in beta. Click on UI elements, leave annotated feedback, and AI generates the fix. Feedback board vs. Feedback-to-code pipeline Canny organizes requests. Yocoolab captures the exact element, maps to source code, and auto-fixes with AI. Canny Text-based feedback board — no visual pinning on the live app Users describe issues in a form instead of clicking on the element No element-level context like CSS selectors or DOM paths No AI assistance — every fix is manual Starts at $400/month — premium enterprise pricing Requests live on a board, disconnected from the actual codebase Feature request → product team → sprint planning → dev — long cycle Yocoolab Click on any element → comment auto-captures screenshot + CSS selector + DOM path Dev opens thread, sees exact element with source mapping — no hunting AI Companion reads the element context and suggests fixes Send to Claude Code → AI opens a PR with the fix automatically Free in beta for everyone — developers, product managers, stakeholders Guests can comment without creating an account One layer: feedback → AI fix → PR — all in one tool Full feature comparison Feature Canny Yocoolab Feedback Workflow Pin feedback directly on live web pages Auto-captures annotated screenshot with every comment Element-to-source code mapping (CSS selector, DOM path) Works on localhost, staging, and production Chrome Extension for instant annotation Kanban board for feedback triage Threaded discussions on feedback items Pricing & Access Free plan available Unlimited free viewer/stakeholder seats No per-user pricing Guest access without account creation AI & Automation AI-powered code fixes from feedback Send element to Claude Code for instant PR Auto-detect framework (React, Vue, Svelte) AI companion for feedback context Automated screenshot annotation Integrations Jira integration Linear integration Slack notifications GitHub PR auto-linking Telegram notifications What Canny actually costs your team Canny starts at $400/month for feature request tracking. No visual annotation or AI code fixes. Team scenario Canny Yocoolab Solo developer Not available Free Small team $400/mo Free Mid-size (25+ users) $400+/mo Free Enterprise Custom Free Canny pricing based on publicly available plans. Accurate as of 2025. Ready for feedback that ships itself? Install the Chrome Extension. Start pinning feedback. Let AI handle the fixes. Free in beta for your whole team. No credit card required. Install Free Chrome Extension Or sign in to dashboard → Questions teams ask before switching Straight answers, including where another tool is still the better choice. Does Yocoolab replace a public roadmap tool? No. Roadmap and request-voting tools are aimed at users at a distance from the product. Yocoolab is aimed at the team working on the product, with feedback pinned to the live interface and a direct route from that pin to an implemented change. Which should we use for internal design and QA review? For anything where the discussion is about a specific screen or element, working on the live product is the shorter path — the context is captured for you, and the thread can go straight to a coding agent. A voting board is the wrong shape for "this button is misaligned on mobile". Can requests move into our normal tracker? Yes. Threads can flow into Jira or Linear with the element context and screenshot attached, so this does not become another silo your team has to check. Can I use Yocoolab and Canny together? Yes, and plenty of teams should. Canny keeps doing what it is good at, and Yocoolab handles the part that happens on the running product — pinning feedback to a real element, keeping the discussion attached to it, and handing that context to a coding agent. Yocoolab is a browser extension, so it sits on top of your app without you migrating anything. Does Yocoolab charge per viewer or per seat? No. In beta the app is free, including for everyone you invite to look at or comment on work. We have not set pricing for after beta and will give clear notice before anything changes. How long does it take to set up? Install the browser extension, sign in, and point it at the URL you want feedback on. There is no SDK to embed and no code change to your app, so the first pinned comment usually happens within a couple of minutes. Keep reading Building UI with AI agents — guides for Claude, Cursor, v0, Lovable and the rest. What is live-product review? — why the review moved off the canvas and onto the running app. The design-to-code workflow with Claude Code — what an agent needs before it can fix a visual bug. Full FAQ — pricing, privacy, agents and self-hosting. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Why Figma's Viewer Seat Pricing Is Costing Your Team Thousands — and the Alternative — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/figma-viewer-seat-pricing-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog Product May 28, 2026 7 min read Why Figma's Viewer Seat Pricing Is Costing Your Team Thousands — and the Alternative By Yocoolab Team Share Figma's pricing model has a hidden cost that most teams don't notice until it's too late: viewer seats. Every developer, PM, stakeholder, and client who needs to see designs costs $15-25/month — even if they never touch the canvas. For a mid-size engineering team of 20 developers, that's $300-500/month just so developers can see design specs. Over a year: $3,600-6,000 . For an enterprise team of 100+ developers, you're looking at $18,000-30,000/year — for view-only access. There's a better way. Here's how teams are eliminating viewer seat costs entirely while getting better design feedback in the process. The Figma Viewer Seat Trap Figma charges per editor — and per viewer. The pricing looks like: | Plan | Editor Seat | Viewer Seat | |------|-------------|-------------| | Professional | $15/mo | $15/mo (unlimited) | | Organization | $25/mo | $25/mo (unlimited) | | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | On the surface, it seems reasonable. But here's the trap: every developer who needs to see design specs is a viewer . Every PM who needs to reference mockups is a viewer. Every stakeholder who wants to see what's being built is a viewer. In practice, a 5-designer team with 25 developers and 10 PMs/stakeholders would pay: • Figma Pro : 5 × $15 = $75/mo for designers + 35 viewer seats = $525/mo → $600/mo total • Annual cost : $7,200 That's $7,200/year just so developers can see what they're building. And that doesn't include the cost of context switching between Figma and their IDE. Why Viewing Designs on a Canvas Is the Wrong Model The fundamental problem isn't just pricing — it's the model itself. Developers don't need to "view designs on a canvas." They need to understand what the product should look like and do — on the actual product . When a developer opens Figma to check a design spec, they're: 1. Leaving the context of their IDE and the actual app 2. Looking at a static mockup that may not match the deployed state 3. Manually translating pixel values to CSS (introducing errors) 4. Missing interactions, states, and edge cases that only appear on the real product The viewer seat model charges you for this broken workflow — and then charges you more as your team grows. The Alternative: Review on the Real Product Yocoolab takes the opposite approach. Instead of bringing developers to a canvas, it brings design feedback to the product: Every viewer is free in beta. There are no viewer seats in Yocoolab — and no per-seat charges at all. Developers, PMs, stakeholders, and clients all use it free. The whole app is free in beta, so there is nothing to meter by user. A team of 5 designers/reviewers using Yocoolab would pay: $0. The full app — unlimited threads, unlimited users and teams, and every integration (Jira, Linear, Slack, GitHub, Telegram, Claude Code) — is free in beta. New advanced features may later be offered as optional paid add-ons, but everything here is included free. That's free for the entire team — vs $600/month for Figma. And developers get more context, not less. What Developers Actually Get When a reviewer pins feedback on the real product using Yocoolab, developers get: 1. The exact element — CSS selector, computed styles, and source file location 2. A screenshot with annotation — showing exactly what needs to change 3. The full page context — URL, viewport, browser state 4. Threaded discussion — all feedback in one place, linked to the element 5. Claude Code integration — send the element to Claude for an automatic fix and PR Compare this to Figma's developer handoff: pixel values, spacing tokens, and color codes — without any connection to the actual codebase. Real Cost Comparison: 25-Developer Team | Item | Figma (Pro) | Yocoolab | |------|-------------|----------| | Designer seats (5) | $75/mo | N/A | | Developer seats (25) | $375/mo | $0 (free) | | PM/Stakeholder seats (10) | $150/mo | $0 (free) | | Active reviewers | N/A | $0 (free) | | Monthly total | $600/mo | $0 | | Annual savings | — | $7,200/year | That's a 100% reduction in tooling cost — and developers get element-level context instead of static design specs. The Hidden Cost: Developer Context Switching The seat cost is visible on your Figma invoice. The context-switching cost isn't — but it's often larger. Every time a developer switches from their IDE to Figma to check a design spec, research shows it takes 23 minutes to regain full focus. If a developer checks Figma just 4 times per day: • 4 context switches × 23 minutes = 92 minutes lost per developer per day • Across 25 developers: 38 hours lost per day • That's nearly 5 full-time employees worth of productivity — lost to context switching At an average developer salary of $150,000/year, that's $750,000/year in lost productivity — dwarfing the seat costs. How Teams Are Migrating Teams moving from Figma-only review to Yocoolab typically follow this pattern: 1. Week 1 : Install the Chrome Extension. Keep using Figma for initial design work. 2. Week 2 : Start pinning review feedback on the deployed app instead of Figma comments. 3. Week 3 : Developers notice they're getting better context and spending less time in Figma. 4. Week 4 : Reduce Figma viewer seats. Developers now reference real-product feedback instead of design specs. The key insight: you don't need to leave Figma entirely. Keep it for initial design work. Use Yocoolab for the review and handoff — where the real costs accumulate. The Bottom Line Figma's viewer seat model made sense when design review happened on a canvas. But modern teams review on the real product — and paying $15-25/month per developer for view-only access to static mockups is a tax on your team's productivity, not an investment in it. Yocoolab eliminates viewer seat costs entirely. Your developers, PMs, and stakeholders can see, comment on, and interact with design feedback — all for free in beta. Install Free — Zero Viewer Seat Costs Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free # Using Yocoolab with a specific AI coding agent ## Building UI With AI? Guides for Every Coding Agent — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-ai Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Build-with-AI guides Any AI can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Chat prompts average toward the generic AI look. These guides show how pointing at the exact element on your live product keeps your taste in the loop — whichever model or builder you use. Building with Claude Claude writes great front-end code, but chat prompts drift to the generic AI look. Yocoolab hands it the exact element, page, and repo a human points at. Building with ChatGPT ChatGPT can build a whole front end from a prompt, but prompt-only building produces the recognizable AI look. Yocoolab lets a human anchor precise context. Building with Gemini Gemini turns prompts into front-end code, but chat-only building produces templated, AI-looking pages. Yocoolab keeps a human choosing precise context. Building with v0 v0 turns prompts into React UI fast, but the output has a recognizable house style. Yocoolab lets a human point at the live result to de-genericize it. Building with Cursor Cursor is a powerful agentic editor, but it works from code, not the rendered result. Yocoolab lets a human point at the live UI and hand it the exact element. Building with Lovable Lovable builds full apps from prompts, but the result carries a generated look. Yocoolab keeps a human pointing at the live app to remove the AI sameness. Building with Bolt Bolt spins up a full app in the browser fast, but the first pass wears a generated look. Yocoolab lets a human pin the live result to de-genericize it. Building with Windsurf Windsurf is an agentic editor, but it reasons about code, not the rendered page. Yocoolab lets a human point at the live UI and hand it the exact element. Building with Replit Agent Replit Agent builds and deploys an app from a prompt, but the result has a generated look. Yocoolab keeps a human pinning the live app to fix it. Building with GitHub Copilot GitHub Copilot is great in the editor, but it works from code, not the rendered page. Yocoolab lets a human point at the live UI and hand it the exact element. Building with Framer Framer AI turns prompts into polished sites, but the output has a recognizable house style. Yocoolab lets a human point at the live result to make it yours. Building with Figma Make Figma Make turns designs into working code fast, but the first pass has a generated feel. Yocoolab lets a human anchor precise context on the live result. Building with Grok Grok can generate front-end code from a prompt, but chat-only building produces the generic AI look. Yocoolab lets a human anchor precise, live-product context. Building with DeepSeek DeepSeek is strong at generating front-end code, but chat-only building looks templated. Yocoolab keeps a human choosing precise context on the live app. Building with Base44 Base44 builds a full app from a prompt, but the result carries a generated look. Yocoolab keeps a human pinning the live app to hand an agent precise context. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building UI with Claude? Keep it from looking AI-generated — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-claude Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Claude · keep the human touch Claude can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Claude is one of the strongest models for writing clean, working front-end code and reasoning about a component from a clear description. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Claude output looks AI-generated Ask Claude in a chat window to "build a landing page" and you get a competent page that looks like every other AI landing page — because the prompt gave it no product to anchor to and no taste to match. The good stuff Claude can do — matching your spacing system, your voice, your one weird intentional layout choice — only happens when it can SEE the specific thing you want changed. A transcript can not show it that. Iterating by re-describing ("the hero, not the nav, the second heading") burns turns and drifts. Claude is guessing which node you mean. What changes when a human points at the real product You point at the actual rendered element in the live app. The pin carries that element, the page URL, and the repo — Claude receives the precise node, not your paragraph about it. Your design judgment is the input. You are the one deciding "this card is generic, tighten it to match the rest" — Claude executes against a real target chosen by a human eye. Claude opens a PR against the mapped repo and moves the thread to In Review. You sign off. The taste call stays yours; the typing is the agent's. The reason AI sites look AI-made is that no human made a specific decision — the model averaged one. Yocoolab inverts that: a person selects exactly what to change on the real product, and Claude only acts on human-chosen targets. The judgment stays human; the labor is delegated. The workflow, end to end 1 Build the first pass with Claude Let Claude scaffold the page or component however you already do — a chat, Claude Code, whatever. 2 Open the live app and pin what is generic Run the app, and click the exact element that reads as machine-made. Say what you want in one sentence. 3 The pin hands Claude the real context Element + page + repo route to Claude via MCP. No re-describing which button you meant. 4 Claude opens a PR; you sign off Review the diff, approve the taste call. The human made the design decision; the agent made the edit. Who this is not for If you are building a throwaway prototype nobody will look at twice, the generic look is fine and this workflow is overhead. It earns its keep when the design has to feel like yours. FAQ Why does Claude-built UI look generic? Not because Claude is weak at design — because a chat prompt gives it no anchor to your actual product and no way to see your taste. It fills the gaps with the average choice. Give it the exact element a human points at and the output stops looking averaged. Does Yocoolab replace Claude Code? No. Yocoolab is how a human hands Claude Code precise, anchored context from the live app — the exact element, page, and repo — instead of a re-typed description. Claude still writes the code and opens the PR. How does the human stay in the loop? A person selects what to change on the real rendered product, and the agent moves the change to In Review — it never auto-closes. A human signs off before anything ships. Keep Claude . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 Building with Cursor All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Stop ChatGPT-built websites from looking generic — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-chatgpt Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with ChatGPT · keep the human touch ChatGPT can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. ChatGPT is a fast way to go from a plain-English idea to working front-end code and copy without leaving a chat box. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why ChatGPT output looks AI-generated A chat window has no anchor to your running product. You describe the button; the model imagines a button. It fills the gaps with the most statistically average choice — the same rounded card, the same violet gradient, the same three-column feature grid every other prompt produced. Design intent lives in your head, not in the transcript. "Make it feel more premium" means something specific to you and nothing specific to the model, so it reverts to the mean. Every correction is a fresh paragraph of prose. By the third "no, the OTHER card" the context has drifted and the model is guessing at which element you mean. What changes when a human points at the real product Instead of a new prompt per fix, you point at the live element that is wrong. The pin carries the element, page, and repo — the model gets a target, not a description. The person with the taste — you — makes the call on the running product. The model acts only on what a human selected, which is the difference between "AI-made" and "made with AI". Changes come back as a PR you review and approve. Nothing ships on the model's say-so. Generic output is what you get when the only judgment in the loop is the model averaging its training data. Put a human at the point of decision — choosing exactly what to change on the real product — and the averaging never gets the last word. The workflow, end to end 1 Draft with ChatGPT Generate the first version of the page or component however you like. 2 Pin the generic parts on the live app Open the running app, click the exact elements that read as templated, and say what you want in a sentence. 3 Precise context routes to your agent Element + page + repo go to an MCP agent — no re-describing which section you meant. 4 Review the PR and sign off The human made the design decision; the agent did the edit. You approve before it merges. Who this is not for If you never look at the result on a real screen — internal tools, one-off scripts — the generic look does not cost you anything and you can skip this. FAQ Why do ChatGPT websites look the same? A prompt has no connection to your rendered product, so the model reaches for the most average pattern — the same hero, gradient, and card grid. Anchoring it to the specific element a human points at removes the guesswork that produces the sameness. Can I use this with ChatGPT and Claude both? Yes. Yocoolab routes the human-selected context to any MCP-compatible agent, so it is not tied to one model. Is this just screenshots-to-AI? No. A screenshot loses the element identity, the page, and which repo owns it. A Yocoolab pin carries all three, which is why the agent edits the right thing the first time. Keep ChatGPT . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with Gemini Building with v0 Building with Cursor All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building with Gemini? Remove the generic AI look — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-gemini Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Gemini · keep the human touch Gemini can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Gemini is capable at generating and refactoring front-end code from a natural-language description. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Gemini output looks AI-generated A chat window has no anchor to your running product. You describe the button; the model imagines a button. It fills the gaps with the most statistically average choice — the same rounded card, the same violet gradient, the same three-column feature grid every other prompt produced. Design intent lives in your head, not in the transcript. "Make it feel more premium" means something specific to you and nothing specific to the model, so it reverts to the mean. Every correction is a fresh paragraph of prose. By the third "no, the OTHER card" the context has drifted and the model is guessing at which element you mean. What changes when a human points at the real product You anchor the fix to the exact live element instead of re-describing it. The pin carries element, page, and repo to the agent. The human eye picks what is generic on the real product; the model only acts on human-chosen targets. Every change arrives as a reviewable PR that a person signs off on. A site looks hand-made when a person made specific, intentional choices. Yocoolab makes the human the one choosing — on the real rendered page — and lets Gemini do the mechanical part. The workflow, end to end 1 Generate with Gemini Scaffold the UI from your prompt as usual. 2 Pin what looks templated On the live app, click the precise elements that read as AI-default. 3 Hand the agent real context Element + page + repo route via MCP — no ambiguity about which part you meant. 4 Approve the PR You make the taste call; the agent makes the edit; you sign off. Who this is not for For quick internal experiments where nobody judges the polish, this loop is more process than you need. FAQ Why does AI-built UI regress to the same look? Because the model, given only a prompt, picks the highest-probability pattern — which is the average of everything it has seen. Anchoring it to a specific human-selected element on your real product replaces the average with intent. Does Yocoolab work with Gemini specifically? Yocoolab routes the human-selected context to any MCP-compatible agent, so the model you use is your choice. What exactly does the agent receive? The pinned element, the page URL, and the repo the page maps to — enough to change the right thing without a back-and-forth about which element you meant. Keep Gemini . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with v0 Building with Cursor All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Make v0 designs look custom, not AI-generated — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-v0 Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with v0 · keep the human touch v0 can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. v0 is a fast way to turn a prompt into a working React + Tailwind interface you can drop into a project. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why v0 output looks AI-generated v0 is excellent at getting you to a working screen fast — but "fast from a prompt" and "looks like your product" are different goals. The first pass carries a recognizable generated-UI house style. To make it yours you have to change specific things: this spacing, that component's copy, the one section that screams template. A prompt cannot point at "that section" on your running app. Re-prompting v0 to fix one element often regenerates three others you liked. The context is the whole screen, not the node you meant. What changes when a human points at the real product Ship the v0 output, then pin the exact elements that read as generated on the live page. The pin carries element, page, and repo. A human decides what to keep and what to change — on the real rendered result, not in a prompt box. The agent edits just those elements and opens a PR. You are no longer regenerating the whole screen to fix one card. v0 gets you a body; a human gives it a face. Yocoolab is where the person makes the specific, surgical calls — on the live product — that turn a generated screen into one that looks intentional. The workflow, end to end 1 Generate the screen with v0 Prompt v0 to the working first pass and get it into your repo. 2 Pin the generated-looking parts On the live app, click the exact elements with the template smell. 3 Agent gets element + page + repo Precise context, so it changes those nodes and nothing else. 4 Review + merge A human signs off on each surgical change instead of regenerating the whole page. Who this is not for If you want a disposable internal dashboard nobody grades on looks, v0 alone is plenty and this is extra steps. FAQ Why do v0 designs look similar to each other? A prompt-to-UI generator optimizes for a good average result, so first passes share a house style. Making it look like YOUR product means surgical, human-chosen edits on specific elements — which is what Yocoolab anchors and hands to an agent. Can I fix v0 output without regenerating everything? Yes — that is the point. You pin the specific elements to change; the agent edits only those and opens a PR, so the parts you liked stay put. Does this replace v0? No. v0 makes the first pass; Yocoolab is the human-in-the-loop refinement layer that de-genericizes it on the live app. Keep v0 . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with Cursor All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building in Cursor? Give the agent precise UI context — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-cursor Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Cursor · keep the human touch Cursor can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Cursor is a strong agentic code editor for making broad, multi-file changes from natural-language instructions. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Cursor output looks AI-generated Cursor reasons about your codebase brilliantly — but it reasons about CODE. The gap between "the JSX for this component" and "how this button actually looks and feels on the running page" is where the generic result hides. Describing a visual problem in the editor ("the spacing on the pricing card feels off") is translating from a screen you can see to words the agent can not. The person who spots the generic look is often not the person in the editor. There is no clean way to hand "this exact element on the live site" from one to the other. What changes when a human points at the real product Anyone on the team points at the live element; the pin carries the element, page URL, and repo straight to a Cursor-style agent via MCP — no translation from screen to prose. Designers and PMs who never open the editor can still hand the agent a precise, code-mapped target. The agent opens a PR; a human signs off. The visual judgment happens on the rendered product, where it belongs. Code-first tools are blind to the rendered result — which is exactly where "generic" lives. Yocoolab moves the point of judgment to the running app and lets a human hand that judgment, precisely anchored, to the agent. The workflow, end to end 1 Build with Cursor Make your changes in the editor however you already work. 2 Judge on the live app Open the running result and pin the elements that read as generic or off. 3 Hand the agent the real target Element + page + repo route via MCP — the agent knows exactly which node. 4 PR + sign-off A human approves the visual call before it merges. Who this is not for If your team is one engineer who is also the designer and never leaves the editor, Cursor alone may already close the loop for you. FAQ Cursor is already agentic — why add Yocoolab? Cursor works from code and prose. Yocoolab adds the missing input: precise context from the RENDERED product — the exact element a human points at on the live app — which is where visual and "generic" problems actually live. Can non-engineers hand work to the agent? Yes. Anyone can pin an element on the live app; the pin carries the code-mapped context, so a designer or PM can hand the agent a precise target without touching the editor. Where does the human sign off? The agent opens a PR and moves the thread to In Review; a human approves before merge. It never auto-closes. Keep Cursor . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Make Lovable apps look custom, not AI-built — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-lovable Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Lovable · keep the human touch Lovable can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Lovable is a fast way to go from a prompt to a working, deployed full-stack app. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Lovable output looks AI-generated Lovable is genuinely good at getting a whole app standing quickly — but "prompt to app" optimizes for working, not for looking like it came from your studio. The first version wears the generated look. De-genericizing it means specific, human calls on specific elements. A chat prompt cannot point at "this card on the dashboard, on the live app". Prompting the builder to change one thing risks regenerating the parts you were happy with. What changes when a human points at the real product Keep the Lovable app; pin the exact elements that read as templated on the live deployment. The pin carries element, page, and repo. A human makes the taste decisions on the real product; the agent edits only the pinned targets. Changes arrive as a PR a person reviews — no regenerating the whole app to fix a section. The fastest way to a working app is a prompt; the fastest way to one that looks made is a human making surgical choices on the live result. Yocoolab is that second half. The workflow, end to end 1 Build the app with Lovable Prompt it to a working, deployed first version. 2 Pin the generic elements On the live app, click the exact parts with the AI-default look. 3 Precise context to the agent Element + page + repo route via MCP so it edits only those nodes. 4 Review + ship A human signs off on each change instead of re-rolling the whole build. Who this is not for For an internal MVP you just need to demo once, Lovable on its own is the right amount of tool. FAQ Why do Lovable apps look AI-built? Prompt-to-app generators optimize for a working average, so the first pass shares a generated aesthetic. Turning it into something that looks like your product means surgical, human-selected edits — which Yocoolab anchors on the live app and hands to an agent. Can I refine without regenerating the whole app? Yes. You pin specific elements; the agent edits only those and opens a PR, leaving the parts you liked untouched. Does Yocoolab replace Lovable? No — it is the human-in-the-loop layer on top. Lovable ships the first version; Yocoolab is how a human de-genericizes it precisely. Keep Lovable . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Make Bolt.new apps look custom, not AI-generated — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-bolt Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Bolt · keep the human touch Bolt can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Bolt.new is a fast way to prompt a full-stack app into existence and run it in the browser without local setup. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Bolt output looks AI-generated Bolt is remarkable at going from nothing to a running app in one prompt — but "from nothing, fast" and "looks like your brand" are different jobs, and the first pass wears the generated look. Re-prompting Bolt to fix one section can regenerate parts you were happy with, because the unit of change is the whole app, not the element you meant. What is generic is obvious on the running screen and invisible in a prompt box. There is no way to point at "that card" from a text field. What changes when a human points at the real product Keep the Bolt app; on the live preview, pin the exact elements that read as templated. The pin carries the element, page, and repo. A human makes the design calls on the rendered result; the agent edits only the pinned nodes and opens a PR. You stop re-rolling the whole build to change one component. Bolt gets you standing in a minute; a human gives it a point of view. Yocoolab is where the person makes the specific, surgical calls on the live app that turn a generated build into one that looks deliberate. The workflow, end to end 1 Prompt the app with Bolt Go from idea to a running app in the browser. 2 Pin the generated-looking parts On the live preview, click the exact elements with the template smell. 3 Agent gets element + page + repo Precise context, so it changes those nodes and nothing else. 4 Review + merge A human signs off on each surgical change instead of regenerating the app. Who this is not for For a hackathon demo or a proof of concept you will throw away, Bolt on its own is exactly enough. FAQ Why do Bolt apps look AI-generated? A prompt-to-app tool optimizes for a good average result, so first passes share a house look. Making it look like your product means surgical, human-chosen edits on specific elements — which Yocoolab anchors on the live app and hands to an agent. Can I fix Bolt output without regenerating everything? Yes. You pin the specific elements to change; the agent edits only those and opens a PR, so the parts you liked stay put. Does this replace Bolt? No — Bolt makes the first pass; Yocoolab is the human-in-the-loop refinement layer that de-genericizes it on the live app. Keep Bolt . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building in Windsurf? Give the agent precise UI context — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-windsurf Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Windsurf · keep the human touch Windsurf can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Windsurf is an agentic editor that makes broad, multi-file changes across a codebase from natural-language instructions. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Windsurf output looks AI-generated Windsurf reasons about your code impressively — but it reasons about CODE. The gap between "the JSX for this section" and "how it actually looks on the running page" is where the generic result hides. Describing a visual problem in the editor is translating from a screen you can see into words the agent cannot. The person who notices the generic look is often not the one driving the editor, and there is no clean handoff for "this exact element on the live site". What changes when a human points at the real product Anyone points at the live element; the pin carries the element, page, and repo to a Windsurf-style agent via MCP — no translating from screen to prose. Designers and PMs who never open the editor can still hand the agent a precise, code-mapped target. The agent opens a PR; a human signs off. The visual judgment happens on the rendered product. Code-first tools are blind to the rendered result — which is exactly where "generic" lives. Yocoolab moves the point of judgment to the running app and lets a human hand that judgment, precisely anchored, to the agent. The workflow, end to end 1 Build with Windsurf Make your changes in the editor however you already work. 2 Judge on the live app Open the running result and pin the elements that read as generic or off. 3 Hand the agent the real target Element + page + repo route via MCP — the agent knows exactly which node. 4 PR + sign-off A human approves the visual call before it merges. Who this is not for If your team is a single engineer who is also the designer and never leaves the editor, Windsurf alone may already close the loop. FAQ Windsurf is already agentic — why add Yocoolab? Windsurf works from code and prose. Yocoolab adds the missing input: precise context from the rendered product — the exact element a human points at on the live app — which is where visual and generic problems actually live. Can non-engineers hand work to the agent? Yes. Anyone can pin an element on the live app; the pin carries the code-mapped context, so a designer or PM can hand a precise target to the agent without touching the editor. Where does the human sign off? The agent opens a PR and moves the thread to In Review; a human approves before merge. It never auto-closes. Keep Windsurf . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Make Replit Agent apps look custom, not AI-built — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-replit Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Replit Agent · keep the human touch Replit Agent can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Replit Agent is a fast way to prompt an app into existence and deploy it without leaving the browser. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Replit Agent output looks AI-generated Replit Agent is genuinely good at getting a working, deployed app up quickly — but prompt-to-app optimizes for working, not for looking like it came from your studio. De-genericizing it means specific, human calls on specific elements, and a prompt cannot point at "this card on the dashboard, on the live app". Nudging the agent to change one thing risks regenerating the parts you were happy with. What changes when a human points at the real product Keep the Replit app; pin the exact elements that read as templated on the live deployment. The pin carries element, page, and repo. A human makes the taste decisions on the real product; the agent edits only the pinned targets. Changes arrive as a PR a person reviews — no regenerating the whole app to fix a section. The fastest way to a working app is a prompt; the fastest way to one that looks made is a human making surgical choices on the live result. Yocoolab is that second half. The workflow, end to end 1 Build the app with Replit Agent Prompt it to a working, deployed first version. 2 Pin the generic elements On the live app, click the exact parts with the AI-default look. 3 Precise context to the agent Element + page + repo route via MCP so it edits only those nodes. 4 Review + ship A human signs off on each change instead of re-rolling the whole build. Who this is not for For an internal MVP you just need to demo once, Replit Agent on its own is the right amount of tool. FAQ Why do Replit Agent apps look AI-built? Prompt-to-app tools optimize for a working average, so the first pass shares a generated aesthetic. Turning it into something that looks like your product means surgical, human-selected edits — which Yocoolab anchors on the live app and hands to an agent. Can I refine without regenerating the whole app? Yes. You pin specific elements; the agent edits only those and opens a PR, leaving the parts you liked untouched. Does Yocoolab replace Replit Agent? No — it is the human-in-the-loop layer on top. Replit ships the first version; Yocoolab is how a human de-genericizes it precisely. Keep Replit Agent . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building UI with GitHub Copilot? Keep the human touch — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-github-copilot Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with GitHub Copilot · keep the human touch GitHub Copilot can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. GitHub Copilot is a strong in-editor assistant for writing and completing code from the context around your cursor. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why GitHub Copilot output looks AI-generated Copilot is excellent at the next line of code — but it sees the file, not the rendered page. The generic look lives in how the whole thing looks running, which never reaches the editor. Its suggestions reach for the most common pattern, which is precisely how a UI ends up looking like every other one. A visual problem you can see on screen has no clean path into the editor except retyping it as a comment. What changes when a human points at the real product Point at the live element; the pin carries the element, page, and repo to an MCP agent — the visual context the editor never had. The human eye decides what is generic on the running product; the agent edits the exact node. Changes come back as a PR a person signs off on before merge. Autocomplete optimizes for the common case — the opposite of a distinctive design. Yocoolab puts a human at the point of judgment on the live app, so the common case never gets the final say on how your product looks. The workflow, end to end 1 Write it with Copilot Build the component in the editor as usual. 2 Judge it running Open the live app and pin the elements that read as generic. 3 Hand the agent the target Element + page + repo route via MCP — no retyping the problem as a comment. 4 Approve the PR The human made the taste call; the agent made the edit; you sign off. Who this is not for If you are the only person who ever sees the result and you live in the editor, Copilot may already be enough for you. FAQ Copilot already helps me code — why Yocoolab? Copilot works from the code around your cursor. Yocoolab adds the input it never sees: precise context from the rendered page — the exact element a human points at on the live app — which is where the generic look actually is. Does this work alongside Copilot? Yes. Copilot helps you write the first pass; Yocoolab is how a human hands an agent precise, live-app context to de-genericize it. How does a non-engineer contribute? They pin an element on the live app; the pin carries the code-mapped context, so anyone can hand a precise target to the agent without opening the editor. Keep GitHub Copilot . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Make Framer AI sites look custom, not AI-generated — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-framer Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Framer · keep the human touch Framer can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Framer is a design-native way to prompt and publish a polished marketing site without hand-coding. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Framer output looks AI-generated Framer AI produces genuinely slick first drafts — which is the trap: slick-but-templated is the exact texture of an AI-built site, and prospects have learned to recognize it. Making it feel like your brand means specific choices on specific sections, and a prompt cannot point at "that testimonial block on the live page". Regenerating to change one section tends to move parts you had already dialed in. What changes when a human points at the real product Publish the Framer site, then pin the exact sections that read as generated. The pin carries the element, page, and repo. A human makes the brand calls on the live site; the agent edits only the pinned sections and opens a PR. You stop regenerating whole pages to adjust one block. Framer gives you polish; a human gives you a point of view. Polish without a point of view is exactly what reads as AI-made — Yocoolab is where the person supplies the point of view on the live site. The workflow, end to end 1 Generate the site with Framer Prompt it to a polished first draft and publish. 2 Pin the templated sections On the live site, click the exact blocks with the generated texture. 3 Agent gets element + page + repo Precise context so it changes only those sections. 4 Review + publish A human signs off on each brand call instead of regenerating pages. Who this is not for For a quick event or coming-soon page that only lives a week, Framer on its own is exactly right. FAQ Why do Framer AI sites look similar? AI site generators optimize for a polished average, so first drafts share a texture. Making one look like your brand means specific human-chosen edits on specific sections — which Yocoolab anchors on the live site and hands to an agent. Can I refine one section without regenerating? Yes. You pin the specific sections to change; the agent edits only those and opens a PR, leaving the rest intact. Does Yocoolab replace Framer? No — Framer builds and publishes; Yocoolab is the human-in-the-loop layer that de-genericizes the result on the live site. Keep Framer . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Turn Figma Make output into a custom build — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-figma-make Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Figma Make · keep the human touch Figma Make can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Figma Make is a way to turn a prompt or a design into working, running code without leaving the design tool. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Figma Make output looks AI-generated Figma Make is great at getting from design to running code quickly — but "running" and "looks like it was crafted" are different bars, and the first pass sits at the first one. Closing that gap means specific edits on specific elements of the running result, which a prompt in the design tool cannot point at. The person who spots the generic feel (a designer, a PM) is often not the one who will merge the change. What changes when a human points at the real product Anyone points at the live element; the pin carries the element, page, and repo to an agent — the running-app context the design tool does not have. The designer who noticed the problem hands the agent a precise, code-mapped target directly. The agent opens a PR; a human signs off on the rendered result. Design-to-code closes the gap to running; it does not close the gap to crafted. Yocoolab puts a human at the crafted end — judging the live result and handing that judgment, precisely anchored, to the agent. The workflow, end to end 1 Generate code with Figma Make Turn the prompt or design into a running build. 2 Judge it running Open the live result and pin the elements that read as generated. 3 Hand the agent the target Element + page + repo route via MCP — no translating from the design tool. 4 Review + merge A human approves the rendered result before it ships. Who this is not for For a quick clickable prototype to validate a flow, Figma Make alone is enough and this is overhead. FAQ Why does Figma Make output feel generic? Design-to-code optimizes for a working result, so the first pass shares a generated feel. Making it look crafted means human-chosen edits on specific elements of the running build — which Yocoolab anchors and hands to an agent. Can a designer hand work to the agent? Yes. A designer pins the element on the live result; the pin carries the code-mapped context, so they hand a precise target to the agent without merging code themselves. Does this replace Figma Make? No — Figma Make gets you to running code; Yocoolab is how a human de-genericizes it on the live result. Keep Figma Make . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building UI with Grok? Keep the human touch — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-grok Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Grok · keep the human touch Grok can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Grok is capable at turning a natural-language request into front-end code in a chat. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Grok output looks AI-generated A chat window has no anchor to your running product. You describe the button; the model imagines a button. It fills the gaps with the most statistically average choice — the same rounded card, the same violet gradient, the same three-column feature grid every other prompt produced. Design intent lives in your head, not in the transcript. "Make it feel more premium" means something specific to you and nothing specific to the model, so it reverts to the mean. Every correction is a fresh paragraph of prose. By the third "no, the OTHER card" the context has drifted and the model is guessing at which element you mean. What changes when a human points at the real product You anchor each fix to the exact live element instead of re-describing it. The pin carries element, page, and repo to the agent. The human eye picks what is generic on the real product; the model acts only on human-chosen targets. Every change arrives as a reviewable PR a person signs off on. A site looks hand-made when a person made specific, intentional choices. Yocoolab makes the human the one choosing — on the real rendered page — and lets Grok do the mechanical part. The workflow, end to end 1 Generate with Grok Scaffold the UI from your prompt as usual. 2 Pin what looks templated On the live app, click the precise elements that read as AI-default. 3 Hand the agent real context Element + page + repo route via MCP — no ambiguity about which part. 4 Approve the PR You make the taste call; the agent makes the edit; you sign off. Who this is not for For a quick internal experiment nobody grades on polish, this loop is more than you need. FAQ Why does AI-built UI regress to the same look? Given only a prompt, the model picks the highest-probability pattern — the average of everything it has seen. Anchoring it to a specific human-selected element on your real product replaces the average with intent. Does Yocoolab work with Grok specifically? Yocoolab routes human-selected context to any MCP-compatible agent, so the model you use is your choice. What does the agent receive? The pinned element, the page URL, and the repo the page maps to — enough to change the right thing without a back-and-forth. Keep Grok . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Building with DeepSeek? Remove the generic AI look — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-deepseek Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with DeepSeek · keep the human touch DeepSeek can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. DeepSeek is a capable model for generating and refactoring front-end code from a description. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why DeepSeek output looks AI-generated A chat window has no anchor to your running product. You describe the button; the model imagines a button. It fills the gaps with the most statistically average choice — the same rounded card, the same violet gradient, the same three-column feature grid every other prompt produced. Design intent lives in your head, not in the transcript. "Make it feel more premium" means something specific to you and nothing specific to the model, so it reverts to the mean. Every correction is a fresh paragraph of prose. By the third "no, the OTHER card" the context has drifted and the model is guessing at which element you mean. What changes when a human points at the real product You anchor the fix to the exact live element instead of re-describing it. The pin carries element, page, and repo. The human eye picks what is generic on the real product; the model only acts on human-chosen targets. Every change arrives as a reviewable PR that a person signs off on. A site looks made when a person made specific, intentional choices. Yocoolab makes the human the one choosing — on the real rendered page — and lets DeepSeek do the mechanical part. The workflow, end to end 1 Generate with DeepSeek Scaffold the UI from your prompt as usual. 2 Pin what looks templated On the live app, click the precise elements that read as AI-default. 3 Hand the agent real context Element + page + repo route via MCP — no ambiguity about which part. 4 Approve the PR You make the taste call; the agent makes the edit; you sign off. Who this is not for For a quick internal tool nobody judges on looks, this loop is more process than you need. FAQ Why does DeepSeek-built UI look generic? A chat prompt gives the model no anchor to your product and no way to see your taste, so it fills the gaps with the average choice. Give it the exact element a human points at and the output stops looking averaged. Can I use DeepSeek and another model together? Yes. Yocoolab routes the human-selected context to any MCP-compatible agent, so it is not tied to one model. Is this just screenshot-to-AI? No. A screenshot loses the element identity, the page, and which repo owns it. A Yocoolab pin carries all three, so the agent edits the right thing the first time. Keep DeepSeek . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Make Base44 apps look custom, not AI-built — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/build-with-base44 Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Building with Base44 · keep the human touch Base44 can build it. A human keeps it from looking AI-built. Base44 is a fast way to prompt a working full app into existence without setup. The generic look shows up when it works from a chat prompt with no anchor to your real product. Here is how to fix that. Why Base44 output looks AI-generated Base44 is genuinely good at getting a whole app working from one prompt — but prompt-to-app optimizes for working, not for looking like your studio made it. De-genericizing it means specific, human calls on specific elements, and a prompt cannot point at "this card on the live app". Nudging the builder to change one thing risks regenerating what you were happy with. What changes when a human points at the real product Keep the Base44 app; pin the exact elements that read as templated on the live deployment. The pin carries element, page, and repo. A human makes the taste calls on the real product; the agent edits only the pinned targets and opens a PR. No regenerating the whole app to fix a section. The fastest way to a working app is a prompt; the fastest way to one that looks made is a human making surgical choices on the live result. Yocoolab is that second half. The workflow, end to end 1 Build the app with Base44 Prompt it to a working, deployed first version. 2 Pin the generic elements On the live app, click the exact parts with the AI-default look. 3 Precise context to the agent Element + page + repo route via MCP so it edits only those nodes. 4 Review + ship A human signs off on each change instead of re-rolling the build. Who this is not for For an internal MVP you only need to demo once, Base44 on its own is the right amount of tool. FAQ Why do Base44 apps look AI-built? Prompt-to-app tools optimize for a working average, so the first pass shares a generated aesthetic. Making it look like your product means surgical, human-selected edits — which Yocoolab anchors on the live app and hands to an agent. Can I refine without regenerating the whole app? Yes. You pin specific elements; the agent edits only those and opens a PR, leaving the parts you liked untouched. Does Yocoolab replace Base44? No — Base44 ships the first version; Yocoolab is the human-in-the-loop layer that de-genericizes it precisely. Keep Base44 . Add the human touch. Pin what looks generic on your live app; your agent gets the exact element, page, and repo — and opens the PR. Free for your whole team, in beta. Install Free — No Seat Fees Sign Up Free More build-with-AI guides Building with Claude Building with ChatGPT Building with Gemini Building with v0 All build-with-AI guides → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. # Documentation and integrations ## Documentation — Get Started With Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Getting Started Pin feedback on any live web page and get it to the right place. No code, no setup on your site — you can be commenting in under a minute. Start here You do not need to be a developer, and you do not need to change your app. Three steps to your first pinned comment: 1 Add the browser extension Install Yocoolab — it is free in beta, and there is nothing to add to your website. 2 Sign in Click the Yocoolab icon in your browser toolbar and sign in with GitHub or Google. No credit card, no trial. 3 Click anything and leave a comment Open the page you want feedback on — your live site, a staging link, or localhost — click any button, image or block of text, and type. Yocoolab captures the screenshot and the exact element for you. Tip That is the whole loop. Anyone you invite can comment for free — designers, clients, whoever needs to point at something. They never need an editor, a dev server, or a seat licence. Invite your team From app.yocoolab.com , create an organization and invite people by email. Everyone you invite can view and comment for free in beta — there are no viewer seats to buy. Comments land in one shared place your whole team can see. Send feedback to your tools Comments can flow automatically into the tools you already use, so nobody has to copy anything across. Pick one below to set it up — each takes a few minutes and only an admin needs to do it once. Every one follows the same three steps: enter your credentials, test the connection, then choose which project or channel the feedback should go to. For developers Optional. Everything above works without any of this. ▸ Connect an AI coding agent (MCP) Yocoolab talks to coding agents over MCP (Model Context Protocol). One command sets it up — the wizard detects Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code and Windsurf and writes the right config for each. # Install and configure npx -y @yocoolab/mcp-server@2 setup Restart your agent and the yocoolab server appears with its tools available. Your agent can then list feedback threads, pull the element, selector, screenshot and conversation for any of them, reply in the thread, and open a pull request that closes it. Full tool reference on the AI Agents page. Source: Yocoolab/mcp-server . ▸ What gets captured with each comment Every thread carries the screenshot with the pin overlay, the element's CSS selector and DOM context, the page URL, viewport size, and the branch in play. That is what lets an AI agent act on a comment without guessing which element someone meant. ▸ How integrations work under the hood All integrations follow the same lifecycle: 1 Configure credentials 2 Test connection 3 Map repos to targets ▸ Security and permissions All API tokens and credentials are encrypted at rest using AES-256-GCM . Credentials are scoped to your organization and never exposed in API responses. Access is controlled by role-based permissions — only org admins can configure integrations. ▸ What you need before configuring integrations A Yocoolab account at app.yocoolab.com An organization created, or an invite to join one Admin role in that organization — required to configure integrations Choose an Integration Jira Two-way sync with Jira Cloud issues Linear Two-way sync with Linear issues Slack Real-time channel notifications Telegram Real-time group notifications Pendo Usage analytics enrichment Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Jira Integration — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/jira Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Jira Integration Two-way sync between Yocoolab threads and Jira Cloud issues. Send feedback to Jira with one click — resolve in either tool and they stay in sync. Overview When a team member sends a Yocoolab thread to Jira, an issue is created with full context: screenshots with pin markers, element selectors, viewport details, and a deep link back to the live app. Comments sync between both tools, and resolving a thread in Yocoolab moves the Jira issue to Done — and vice versa. Prerequisites Jira Cloud account (Server/Data Center not supported) Permission to generate an API token for your Atlassian account The email address associated with your Jira account Your Jira site URL (e.g., yourteam.atlassian.net ) Setup Steps 1 Generate a Jira API token Go to id.atlassian.com/manage-profile/security/api-tokens and click Create API token . Give it a label like "Yocoolab" and copy the token. You won't be able to see it again. 2 Open Yocoolab integration settings In the admin dashboard at app.yocoolab.com , go to Settings → Integrations → Jira . 3 Enter your Jira credentials Fill in three fields: Site URL — e.g., yourteam.atlassian.net Email — the email on your Atlassian account API Token — the token you just generated Click Save . Yocoolab validates the credentials by calling the Jira REST API. 4 Test the connection Click Test Connection . You should see your Jira user name and a list of accessible projects. 5 Map repositories to Jira projects For each Yocoolab repository, select a Jira project and issue type (e.g., Task, Bug). When a thread from that repo is sent to Jira, the issue lands in the mapped project. 6 Set up a webhook (optional) For two-way sync (Jira status changes reflect back to Yocoolab), configure a Jira webhook: In Jira, go to Settings → System → WebHooks and create a webhook pointing to: https://api.yocoolab.com/api/v1/jira/webhook Select the Issue updated and Issue deleted events. Verification Create a test thread in Yocoolab on a mapped repository. Click Send to Jira in the thread actions. The Jira issue should appear in your project with the thread title, screenshot, element context, and a link back to the live app. Reference ▸ API endpoints Method Endpoint Description POST /api/v1/jira/config Save Jira credentials (site URL, email, API token) GET /api/v1/jira/config Get current Jira configuration status GET /api/v1/jira/test Test stored Jira credentials GET /api/v1/jira/projects List accessible Jira projects POST /api/v1/jira/mappings Create or update a repo-to-project mapping GET /api/v1/jira/mappings List all repo-to-project mappings DELETE /api/v1/jira/config Disconnect Jira integration ▸ Troubleshooting Warning 401 Unauthorized — Your API token may be expired or incorrect. Generate a new token at id.atlassian.com. Warning 403 Forbidden — Your Jira user may not have permission to access the project. Check project permissions in Jira. Note Site URL format — Use just the domain without https:// . For example: yourteam.atlassian.net , not https://yourteam.atlassian.net . Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Linear Integration — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/linear Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Linear Integration Two-way sync with Linear issues. Threads become issues with full context, and status stays in sync across both tools. Overview When a Yocoolab thread is sent to Linear, an issue is created with Markdown descriptions including deployment URLs, selectors, PR links, and viewport details. Resolving a thread in Yocoolab transitions the Linear issue to Done, and completing an issue in Linear auto-resolves the Yocoolab thread. Prerequisites A Linear workspace Permission to create API keys in Linear settings Setup Steps 1 Create a Linear API key In Linear, go to Settings → API → Personal API Keys and click Create Key . Copy the key — you won't be able to see it again. 2 Open Yocoolab integration settings In the admin dashboard, go to Settings → Integrations → Linear . 3 Enter your Linear API key Paste the API key and click Save . Yocoolab validates the key by querying the Linear GraphQL API. 4 Test the connection Click Test Connection . You should see your Linear user name and workspace. 5 Map repositories to Linear teams For each Yocoolab repository, select a Linear team. When a thread from that repo is sent to Linear, the issue is created in the mapped team. 6 Set up a webhook (optional) For two-way sync, configure a Linear webhook: In Linear, go to Settings → API → Webhooks and create a webhook pointing to: https://api.yocoolab.com/api/v1/linear/webhook Select the Issues resource with Update and Remove actions. Verification Create a test thread and send it to Linear. The issue should appear in the mapped team with a Markdown description containing the thread context, screenshot link, and a deep link back to the live app. Reference ▸ API endpoints Method Endpoint Description POST /api/v1/linear/config Save Linear API key GET /api/v1/linear/config Get current Linear configuration status GET /api/v1/linear/test Test stored Linear credentials GET /api/v1/linear/teams List accessible Linear teams POST /api/v1/linear/mappings Create or update a repo-to-team mapping GET /api/v1/linear/mappings List all repo-to-team mappings DELETE /api/v1/linear/config Disconnect Linear integration ▸ Troubleshooting Warning Invalid API key — Linear API keys are long alphanumeric strings starting with lin_api_ . Make sure you copied the full key. Note Team not found — The API key must belong to a user who is a member of the team you want to map. Check your Linear team membership. Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Slack Integration — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/slack Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Slack Integration Real-time notifications to your Slack channels. Every thread lifecycle event — created, Claude working, PR opened, resolved — posts automatically. Overview When connected, Yocoolab posts rich notifications to your chosen Slack channels. Each notification includes the thread summary, element context, priority, screenshots, and direct links. Your team watches work happen in real time without leaving Slack. Prerequisites A Slack workspace where you can install apps Permission to create a Slack app (or workspace admin access) Setup Steps 1 Create a Slack app Go to api.slack.com/apps and click Create New App → From scratch . Name it "Yocoolab" and select your workspace. 2 Add bot scopes Go to OAuth & Permissions and add these Bot Token Scopes : chat:write — Send messages to channels channels:read — List available channels 3 Install to your workspace Click Install to Workspace and authorize. Copy the Bot User OAuth Token (starts with xoxb- ). 4 Enter the bot token in Yocoolab In the admin dashboard, go to Settings → Integrations → Slack . Paste the bot token and click Save . 5 Test the connection Click Test Connection . You should see your workspace name and a list of channels. 6 Map repositories to Slack channels For each Yocoolab repository, select a Slack channel. All thread notifications for that repo will post to the mapped channel. Tip Make sure the Yocoolab bot has been invited to the channel. In Slack, type /invite @Yocoolab in the target channel. What Gets Notified Thread created New feedback with screenshot, priority, and element context Claude Code working Status update when Claude starts processing PR created Link to the pull request with branch name Thread resolved Confirmation that the issue is fixed Reference ▸ API endpoints Method Endpoint Description POST /api/v1/slack/config Save Slack bot token GET /api/v1/slack/config Get current Slack configuration status GET /api/v1/slack/test Test stored Slack credentials GET /api/v1/slack/channels List accessible Slack channels POST /api/v1/slack/mappings Create or update a repo-to-channel mapping GET /api/v1/slack/mappings List all repo-to-channel mappings DELETE /api/v1/slack/config Disconnect Slack integration ▸ Troubleshooting Warning Bot not in channel — If notifications aren't posting, the bot may not be a member of the channel. Invite it with /invite @Yocoolab . Warning Missing scopes — If you see a missing_scope error, go back to your Slack app's OAuth settings and add the required scopes, then reinstall the app. Note Private channels — The bot can post to private channels, but it must be explicitly invited first. Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Telegram Integration — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/telegram Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Telegram Integration Real-time notifications to your Telegram groups. Every stage of the feedback loop posts automatically — your team sees progress as it happens. Overview Yocoolab sends rich notifications to Telegram at every thread lifecycle stage: new feedback, Claude working, PR created, and resolved. Each message includes the thread summary, priority, element context, and direct links. Your team stays informed right where they already communicate. Prerequisites A Telegram account A Telegram group where you want notifications Access to @BotFather on Telegram Setup Steps 1 Create a Telegram bot Open Telegram and message @BotFather . Send /newbot and follow the prompts: Choose a display name (e.g., "Yocoolab Notifications") Choose a username (e.g., "yocoolab_your_team_bot") BotFather will give you a bot token . Copy it. 2 Add the bot to your group Open the Telegram group where you want notifications. Add the bot as a member by searching for its username. 3 Get the chat ID Send any message in the group, then open this URL in your browser (replace YOUR_TOKEN with your bot token): https://api.telegram.org/botYOUR_TOKEN/getUpdates Find the chat.id value in the response. Group chat IDs are negative numbers (e.g., -1001234567890 ). 4 Enter credentials in Yocoolab In the admin dashboard, go to Settings → Integrations → Telegram . Paste the bot token and click Save . 5 Test the connection Click Test Connection . You should see the bot's username confirming the token is valid. 6 Map repositories to Telegram chats For each Yocoolab repository, enter the Telegram chat ID. All thread notifications for that repo will post to the mapped group. What Gets Notified Thread created New feedback with summary, priority, and element context Claude Code working Real-time status update with thread reference PR created Pull request link with branch name Thread resolved Confirmation with resolution summary Reference ▸ API endpoints Method Endpoint Description POST /api/v1/telegram/config Save Telegram bot token GET /api/v1/telegram/config Get current Telegram configuration status GET /api/v1/telegram/test Test stored Telegram credentials POST /api/v1/telegram/mappings Create or update a repo-to-chat mapping GET /api/v1/telegram/mappings List all repo-to-chat mappings DELETE /api/v1/telegram/config Disconnect Telegram integration ▸ Troubleshooting Warning Bot not posting — Make sure the bot is added to the group. Telegram bots can only send messages to groups they're a member of. Warning Chat ID format — Group chat IDs are negative numbers. If you're using a supergroup, the ID starts with -100 . Note DM notifications — You can also use a personal chat ID (positive number) to receive notifications as direct messages from the bot. Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Pendo Integration — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/pendo Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Pendo Analytics Enrich every feedback thread with real usage data. Page views, unique visitors, feature adoption, and active guides — all pulled from Pendo automatically. Overview Unlike other integrations, Pendo doesn't create issues or send notifications. Instead, it enriches every Yocoolab thread with analytics for the page where feedback was left. Your team can see how many users visit that page, how widely used the feature is, and what onboarding guides are active — so they can prioritize fixes based on real impact, not guesswork. Prerequisites A Pendo account with API access Permission to create integration keys in Pendo settings Setup Steps 1 Get your Pendo integration key In Pendo, go to Settings → Integrations → Integration Keys . Create a new key with read access. Copy the key. 2 Enter the key in Yocoolab In the admin dashboard, go to Settings → Integrations → Pendo . Paste the integration key and click Save . 3 Test the connection Click Test Connection . Yocoolab validates the key by running a test aggregation query against the Pendo API. Tip Pendo doesn't require repo-to-target mapping. Once connected, analytics data is automatically attached to every thread based on the page URL where the feedback was created. What Data is Enriched Page Views Total views for the page in the last 7 days Unique Visitors Distinct users who visited the page Feature Adoption Usage rate for the feature being discussed Active Guides Pendo guides targeting the same page or element Reference ▸ API endpoints Method Endpoint Description POST /api/v1/pendo/config Save Pendo integration key GET /api/v1/pendo/config Get current Pendo configuration status GET /api/v1/pendo/test Test stored Pendo credentials DELETE /api/v1/pendo/config Disconnect Pendo integration ▸ Troubleshooting Warning No data for page — Pendo analytics are matched by URL. If the page URL doesn't exist in Pendo's data (e.g., it's a new page or uses a different URL scheme), no analytics will be shown. Note Data freshness — Pendo data is queried on demand when a thread is viewed. Analytics reflect the most recent 7-day window. Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## AI Agents — Connect Claude Code, Cursor and More — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/ai-agents Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo AI Coding Agents Connect Yocoolab to your AI coding agent via MCP. Click an element in Chrome, send it to your agent, and get a fix with full context. Quick Start 1 Install the Chrome extension Get it from the Chrome Web Store , pin it, and sign in with GitHub or Google. You'll need this to capture elements and send feedback to your agent. 2 Run the setup wizard One command auto-detects every installed agent and writes the right config for each: npx -y @yocoolab/mcp-server@2 setup The wizard detects Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, and Windsurf. No global install needed — it runs straight from npm. 3 Add your Yocoolab JWT Open the Yocoolab Chrome Extension → Settings → API Token , copy the JWT, and paste it into the YOCOOLAB_TOKEN placeholder. Token is optional — without it, bridge / companion / activity tools still work; only thread-feedback tools require it. 4 Restart your agent MCP servers load at agent startup. Quit and reopen your agent — Yocoolab tools should appear automatically. Try: "Show me all open feedback for my repo." Tip Prefer to configure manually? Pick your agent below for the exact config snippet, file path, and platform-specific instructions. Agent Setup Guides Claude Code Roo Code Cline Cursor Windsurf Claude Code Anthropic Config file .mcp.json — Project root Setup Create a .mcp.json file in your project root, or run the setup command. Configuration { "mcpServers": { "yocoolab": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@yocoolab/mcp-server@2"], "env": { "YOCOOLAB_API_URL": "https://app.yocoolab.com", "YOCOOLAB_TOKEN": "", "GITHUB_TOKEN": "" } } } } Tip Replace with your Yocoolab JWT (from the Chrome extension settings) and with a GitHub personal access token that has repo write permissions. Available Tools Once connected, your agent has access to these tools: list_open_threads Show unresolved feedback threads for a repo get_thread_context Full thread details — screenshot, selector, messages, element metadata create_pr_for_thread Create a GitHub PR with code changes linked to a thread mark_thread_addressed Resolve a thread with a closing message get_latest_selection Get the element you just clicked in Chrome get_selection_history Recent element selections from the extension find_source_for_selection Map a UI element to source files with confidence scoring get_element_context Full element metadata, computed styles, and source candidates Environment Variables Variable Required Purpose YOCOOLAB_API_URL No Backend URL (default: https://app.yocoolab.com) YOCOOLAB_TOKEN No JWT from the Chrome extension. Required only for thread-feedback tools. GITHUB_TOKEN No GitHub PAT for PR creation YOCOOLAB_BRIDGE_PORT No HTTP bridge port (default: 9800) Source & Releases Source: github.com/Yocoolab/mcp-server npm: @yocoolab/mcp-server (Apache-2.0) Node.js 20 or newer (active LTS) Releases publish with cryptographic provenance via OIDC trusted publishing — verifiable on the npm package page. Example Workflow Tip Try saying: "Show me all open feedback for my-org/my-repo and fix the most urgent one." Agent calls list_open_threads to see all feedback Agent calls get_thread_context on the highest priority thread Agent sees the screenshot, element selector, and feedback messages Agent reads your source files and makes changes Agent calls create_pr_for_thread to push a PR Agent calls mark_thread_addressed to resolve the thread Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Permissions & Access — Who Can See What — Yocoolab Docs URL: https://yocoolab.com/docs/permissions Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Integration Guides Getting Started AI Coding Agents Permissions & Access Jira Linear Slack Telegram Pendo Permissions & access Two things decide what someone can reach: their workspace role and the projects they have been given access to . They are separate on purpose. The one rule to remember Managing the workspace is not the same as seeing its work. An Admin runs the workspace — people, billing, settings — and still only opens the projects they were invited to. Being an Admin does not quietly hand someone every project. Workspace roles Role Can manage Can see Owner Everything, including billing and roles Every project. The only role that can. Admin People, billing, workspace settings Only the projects they were invited to Member Projects they create or manage Only the projects they were invited to An Owner can change anyone's role from Members . Nobody can change their own, and an Admin cannot promote anyone — a role change is how access is granted, so it stays with the Owner. Project access Every project has a Who can access setting, in the project's Access dialog. It is the whole answer to "who can open this": Only people invited — the default. Private. Nobody sees it until you add them. Everyone in the workspace — can view — anyone in your workspace can find it and read the threads. Everyone in the workspace — can edit — anyone in your workspace can also comment and resolve. New projects start private. Connected GitHub repositories are different: a repo you connect is shared with the workspace by definition, so its threads are visible to your members. Inviting someone to one project Open the project's Access dialog and add them with one of three levels: Can view — read threads and comments Can edit — comment, reply and resolve Can manage — also rename the project, add repos and invite others to it Note Can manage applies to that project only. It is how you let someone run one project without giving them anything else in the workspace. It is not the same as a workspace Admin. Checking who can actually see a project The Access dialog lists everyone you invited, and underneath, an Also has access section for anyone who can open the project without an invitation — the workspace Owner, the person who created it, or everyone in the workspace if you shared it that way. If that section is empty and the list shows one name, exactly one person can open it. Common questions I invited someone to one project and they can see everything. Check their workspace role under Members . Owners can open every project. If they are an Owner or Admin and should not be, change them to Member — the invitation you gave them keeps working, and they will only see that project. Someone cannot see a project I invited them to. They need to be in the workspace first, then invited to the project. Being in the workspace alone does not give access to a private project. Can I let someone manage a project without giving them the whole workspace? Yes — that is exactly what Can manage on the project is for. Leave their workspace role as Member. Ready to start reviewing on the real product? Install the free Chrome Extension, connect your tools, and start shipping faster — in under a minute. Install Extension — Free Or sign in to the dashboard → No seat fees in beta. Every team member included — designers, developers, PMs, stakeholders. Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. # Articles ## What Is Live-Product Review? The Complete 2026 Guide to Real-Time Design Feedback — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/what-is-live-product-review Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog Product May 30, 2026 8 min read What Is Live-Product Review? The Complete 2026 Guide to Real-Time Design Feedback By Yocoolab Team Share What Is Live-Product Review? Live-product review is a design QA methodology where feedback is given on the actual running web application — not static mockups, not Figma files, not screenshots — but the real, rendered, interactive product. Instead of a designer marking up a Figma file with "move this 4px left" annotations, a reviewer clicks directly on the live staging app, writes feedback, and the tool captures the exact CSS selector, DOM path, and a screenshot. The engineer sees exactly where the issue is, down to the line of code. This is the opposite of the traditional design review workflow. And it is transforming how engineering teams ship UI. The Traditional Design Review Problem For decades, design review worked the same way: 1. Designer creates mockups in Figma/Sketch 2. Developer implements based on mockups 3. Reviewer compares the implementation to the mockups 4. Discrepancies are filed as tickets with screenshots 5. Developer interprets the screenshot, finds the element, fixes it 6. Repeat until the implementation matches the mockup This workflow has three fundamental problems: Problem 1: The Mockup-Reality Gap Figma designs look perfect at 1440px with placeholder content. Real apps have real data, variable content lengths, browser quirks, and responsive breakpoints. The design that looked flawless in Figma breaks at 768px when a user's name is 25 characters instead of 10. Problem 2: The Interpretation Tax Every screenshot-based bug report carries an interpretation tax. The developer must: • Identify which page the screenshot is from • Find the element in the actual DOM • Determine whether the screenshot was taken at the current code state • Guess what CSS change would fix the visual issue Studies show this interpretation tax costs 15-45 minutes per bug. Problem 3: The Feedback Loop Latency Designer files bug → developer sees it next day → developer asks clarifying question → designer responds next day → developer implements → back to QA. Each cycle takes 24-48 hours. A 5-minute CSS fix can take a week to land. How Live-Product Review Solves These Problems Direct Element Targeting When you click an element on the live app, the tool captures: • CSS selector — the unique DOM path (e.g., `.pricing-card:nth-child(2) .price-amount`) • Coordinates — x, y, width, height relative to the viewport • Element metadata — tag name, visible text, computed styles • Page context — full URL, viewport dimensions, scroll position • Screenshot — annotated visual snapshot The developer sees this and immediately knows: "This is the second pricing card's price amount text, at line 247 of PricingCard.tsx, and it has a font-size of 14px but should be 16px." Zero Clarification Required Because the tool captures the exact element, the developer never needs to ask "which button?" or "what page is this on?" The feedback is self-contained and actionable on arrival. AI-Powered Fixes The most advanced live-product review tools (Yocoolab) can send the element context directly to Claude Code. Claude reads the source file, generates the fix, and opens a PR — all within minutes of the feedback being submitted. [See how Yocoolab enables live-product review →](/) Live-Product Review vs. Traditional Methods | Method | Element Precision | Time to Fix | Requires Designer | AI Fix Possible | |--------|-------------------|-------------|-------------------|-----------------| | Figma comments | Low (mockup vs reality gap) | 2-4 hours | Yes | No | | Screenshot + Jira ticket | Medium (visual only) | 1-3 hours | No | Limited | | Loom video + Slack | Medium (visual + verbal) | 1-2 hours | No | No | | Live-product review (Yocoolab) | High (CSS selector + DOM path) | 15-30 min | No | ✅ Yes | Who Benefits Most from Live-Product Review? Engineering Managers: Fewer "status update" meetings. The dashboard shows exactly what feedback is pending, in progress, or resolved. Frontend Engineers: No more "what element is this?" detective work. Every feedback item comes with the exact CSS selector. Product Managers: Give actionable design feedback without needing design or engineering skills. Click, describe the problem, and the engineer handles implementation. QA Engineers: Test the actual product at any screen size, on any page, and file bugs that engineers can fix without clarification. Agencies: Send client feedback directly into the development pipeline. No more forwarding emails or interpreting vague client notes. Implementing Live-Product Review on Your Team Week 1: Install and Pilot Install a live-product review tool on your staging environment. Pick one active feature and use it for all design feedback on that feature. Week 2: Establish Conventions Define your team's feedback format: • Title: One-line summary of the issue • Body: What is wrong, what the expected behavior should be, and priority • Labels: P0/P1/P2, frontend/backend, and which team owns it Week 3: Integrate with Your Workflow Connect the tool to your project management system (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues). Feedback should appear where engineers already work. Week 4: Measure the Impact Track: • Average time from feedback to fix • Number of clarifying questions per feedback item • Engineer satisfaction (survey) • Designer/PM satisfaction (survey) The Bottom Line Live-product review is not a tool category — it is a workflow philosophy. Review the real product, not a fake canvas. Capture element context, not just screenshots. Enable AI-powered fixes, not just human implementation. Teams that adopt live-product review ship UI changes 3-5x faster than teams stuck in the Figma-screenshot-Jira triangle. The technology exists today. The only question is how fast your team can adopt it. Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free ## How to Set Up the Yocoolab Chrome Extension in 60 Seconds — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/chrome-extension-setup-guide Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog Engineering May 28, 2026 5 min read How to Set Up the Yocoolab Chrome Extension in 60 Seconds By Yocoolab Team Share Getting started with Yocoolab takes less than a minute. No SDK integration. No code changes. No deployment. Just install the Chrome Extension and start pinning feedback directly on any web app — localhost, staging, or production. Step 1: Install the Extension Visit the Chrome Web Store and search for "Yocoolab" or install it directly from the [Yocoolab website](https://yocoolab.com). Click "Add to Chrome" and confirm the installation. That's it. No configuration files. No environment variables. No npm install. Step 2: Log In Click the Yocoolab icon in your Chrome toolbar. Sign in with your GitHub or Google account. This takes about 10 seconds. Yocoolab uses OAuth 2.0 — the same authentication standard used by Google, GitHub, and thousands of enterprise apps. Your credentials are never stored on our servers. Step 3: Connect Your Repos After logging in, you'll land on the Yocoolab dashboard at app.yocoolab.com. Connect your GitHub repositories by clicking "Add Repository" and selecting the repos you want to review. Once connected, the extension automatically detects which repo your page belongs to and routes feedback to the right team. Step 4: Start Pinning Feedback Navigate to any page in your web app. Click the floating Yocoolab button (the pink circle in the bottom-right corner of your screen). Then click any element on the page. A comment panel opens with: • A screenshot of the element you clicked • The CSS selector and DOM path (captured automatically) • The page URL and view context • A text input for your feedback Type your feedback and hit Enter. That's your first pinned comment. What Happens Behind the Scenes When you pin a comment, Yocoolab captures: • Screenshot — the exact visual state of the element • CSS Selector — the precise DOM path to the element • Framework Info — React, Vue, Svelte, or vanilla JS • Source Location — file and line number (if source maps are available) • View Context — what's around the element on the page All of this happens automatically. You just click and type. What You Can Do Next Once you're pinning feedback, the real power of Yocoolab unlocks: • Send to Claude Code — Click "Send to Claude" on any thread and Claude receives the full element context, writes the fix, and creates a PR automatically • Connect Jira/Linear — Threads sync bidirectionally with your project management tools • Notify Slack/Telegram — Team members get notified when feedback is pinned or resolved • Track with Kanban — Organize feedback through Backlog → To Do → In Progress → In Review → Done Works Everywhere The extension works on: • localhost — Review features before they ship • Staging — QA on deployed previews • Production — Catch visual bugs your users are seeing • Vercel/Netlify previews — Review PR preview deployments • GitHub Pages — Works on static sites too No whitelisting needed. No CORS configuration. No SDK injection. The extension operates at the browser level, so it sees the rendered page exactly as your users do. The Bottom Line Sixty seconds from zero to reviewing on the real product. No code changes. No deployment. No setup. That's the Yocoolab way — eliminate the tooling friction so your team can focus on shipping. Install the Extension — Free Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free ## From Design Feedback to Merged PR in Under 10 Minutes with Claude Code — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/claude-code-design-to-code-workflow Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog AI & Automation May 27, 2026 7 min read From Design Feedback to Merged PR in Under 10 Minutes with Claude Code By Yocoolab Team Share The promise of AI-assisted development has always been tantalizing: describe what you want, and the AI writes the code. But the reality has been messier. You still need to provide context — which file to edit, what the CSS selector is, what the component hierarchy looks like, what framework you're using. Until now. Claude Code, paired with Yocoolab's automatic element context capture, closes the loop between design feedback and code implementation faster than any human could. The Old Way: 7 Steps, 4 Tools, 45+ Minutes Here's what the traditional design-feedback-to-code-fix workflow looks like: 1. Reviewer finds a visual bug on the deployed app 2. Takes a screenshot (manually) 3. Opens Figma to find the corresponding design 4. Writes a Jira ticket describing the issue 5. Pings the developer on Slack with the ticket link 6. Developer opens Jira, reads the description, opens the app, inspects the element to find the CSS selector 7. Developer writes the fix, creates a PR Average time: 45+ minutes per piece of feedback. And that's when everything goes smoothly. If the description is vague ("the button looks wrong"), add another 20 minutes of back-and-forth. The New Way: 3 Steps, 1 Tool, Under 10 Minutes With Yocoolab + Claude Code: 1. Reviewer clicks the element on the live app, writes "Fix padding to match design spec," and clicks Send to Claude 2. Claude receives the full context: screenshot of the element, CSS selector, DOM path, computed styles, framework type (React/Vue/Svelte), source file location, and the reviewer's message 3. Claude writes the fix, creates a PR, and notifies the team on Slack Average time: under 10 minutes. No Jira ticket. No Slack ping. No context gathering. The feedback flows directly from the reviewer's eye to the developer's PR. How Claude Code Gets the Full Picture When you click "Send to Claude" from a Yocoolab comment, here's exactly what Claude receives: • Screenshot of the element with annotation showing exactly what was clicked • CSS selector — e.g., `.product-card:nth-child(3) .price-tag` • DOM path — the full element hierarchy • Computed styles — the current rendered styles (padding, margin, font-size, colors) • Framework detection — React, Vue, Svelte, or vanilla • Source file location — if source maps are available, the exact file and line number • View context — what else is on the page around the element • The reviewer's message — what needs to change This is the difference between telling Claude "fix a button" and telling Claude "in `src/components/ProductCard.tsx` line 142, the `.price-tag` span has `padding: 8px 12px` but should be `padding: 12px 16px` to match the design spec." Real Workflow Example Here's a concrete example from a real dev team: Scenario: The pricing page's "Pro" plan card has a misaligned feature list — the checkmarks don't line up with the text. Without Yocoolab: • Reviewer: "The Pro card checkmarks aren't aligned with the text on the pricing page" • Developer: "Which checkmarks? The feature list? Can you send a screenshot?" • Reviewer: *takes screenshot, uploads to Slack* • Developer: *opens the page, inspects element, finds the flex container, adjusts alignment* • Time elapsed: 35 minutes With Yocoolab + Claude Code: • Reviewer: Clicks the misaligned checkmark → writes "Align checkmarks with text in Pro card" → Send to Claude • Claude receives: CSS selector `.pricing-card.pro .feature-item`, DOM path, computed styles showing `align-items: flex-start`, source file `src/components/Pricing.tsx` line 89 • Claude: Changes `align-items: flex-start` to `align-items: center`, creates PR, notifies Slack • Time elapsed: 4 minutes Setting It Up (Takes Under a Minute) 1. Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension — one click from the Chrome Web Store 2. Connect your tools — Jira, Linear, GitHub, Slack, Telegram (optional: Pendo for analytics) 3. Set up Claude Code — the extension auto-configures the MCP server for Claude 4. Start sending feedback — click any element on any URL, write what needs to change, hit Send to Claude No code changes to your app. No SDK integration. Works on localhost, staging, and production. What Claude Code Can Handle In practice, the more self-contained and visual the change, the more reliable the result. Roughly in order of how well it tends to work: • Style fixes (padding, margin, colors, typography) — usually a clean one-shot fix • Layout adjustments (flex, grid, responsive) — works well when the element is well-scoped • Component behavior (click handlers, state) — depends on how the code is structured • Complex logic (data fetching, API integration) — best treated as a draft to review, not an auto-merge Where it can't fully land the change, Claude still gives you a detailed analysis of what needs to happen — with the element, screenshot, and context already gathered — so a developer can take over without starting from scratch. Always review the PR before merging. The Bottom Line The design-to-code gap has been the bottleneck in web development for decades. Claude Code doesn't eliminate it — but combined with automatic element context from Yocoolab, it shrinks it from 45 minutes to under 10 minutes per piece of feedback. That's not just faster. It fundamentally changes what's possible. When feedback takes 10 minutes instead of 45, teams review more thoroughly, catch more issues, and ship higher-quality products — all while shipping faster. The future of design handoff isn't better mockups. It's AI that understands the real product and can fix it instantly. Try Claude Code Integration Free Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free ## How to Automate Design Feedback with Jira and Yocoolab — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/jira-integration-automated-design-feedback Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog Engineering May 28, 2026 7 min read How to Automate Design Feedback with Jira and Yocoolab By Yocoolab Team Share Jira is the backbone of issue tracking for thousands of dev teams. But design feedback often lives outside Jira — in Figma, Slack, or scattered email threads. Yocoolab bridges this gap by bringing design feedback directly into your Jira workflow, complete with visual context, element capture, and automated Claude Code PR generation. The Problem: Design Feedback Outside the System of Record Most teams' issue tracking lives in Jira. Every bug, feature, and task has a ticket. But design feedback? That's a different story: • Designers leave comments in Figma — invisible to developers working in Jira • Reviewers screenshot issues and paste them into Slack — lost after a day of chat • Feedback gets mentioned in standup but never makes it into a ticket • PMs create Jira tickets from feedback, but the visual context gets lost in translation The result: design issues slip through because they never enter the team's system of record. Features ship with visual bugs that weren't in any ticket. How Yocoolab + Jira Fixes This Yocoolab connects to Jira through its native integration, creating a bidirectional sync between pinned feedback and Jira tickets. Pinning Feedback → Creating Jira Tickets When you pin a comment on a live page and tag it for Jira: 1. The comment appears in your Yocoolab dashboard with full visual context (screenshot, CSS selector, DOM path) 2. A corresponding Jira ticket is created automatically, linked to your project 3. The Jira ticket includes a link back to the Yocoolab thread — so developers see the screenshot, element context, and reviewer's comment without leaving Jira 4. Status changes sync both ways: resolve in Yocoolab → transition Jira ticket; close Jira ticket → resolve Yocoolab thread Send to Claude Code from Jira Here's where it gets powerful. A developer working from a Jira ticket linked to Yocoolab can: 1. Open the linked Yocoolab thread from the Jira ticket 2. Click "Send to Claude" — Claude receives the element's full context (screenshot, selector, framework, source location) plus the reviewer's message 3. Claude writes the fix and creates a PR linked to the Jira ticket The feedback flows from reviewer's eye → pinned comment → Jira ticket → Claude Code → PR — all without anyone manually creating tickets, copying context, or switching tools. Setting Up the Jira Integration 1. Log in to Yocoolab at app.yocoolab.com 2. Go to Settings → Integrations and click "Connect Jira" 3. Enter your Jira credentials: - Site URL (e.g., https://your-company.atlassian.net) - Email (your Jira account email) - API Token (generate one from https://id.atlassian.com/manage-profile/security/api-tokens) 4. Select your Jira project — Yocoolab will list available projects 5. Map your workflows — choose which Jira statuses correspond to Yocoolab states (Open, In Progress, Resolved) Once connected, every Yocoolab thread can create and sync with Jira tickets. What Gets Synced | Field | Direction | Description | |-------|-----------|-------------| | Title | Yocoolab → Jira | Thread title becomes Jira summary | | Description | Yocoolab → Jira | Message content + screenshot reference | | Status | Bidirectional | Resolve/open syncs both ways | | Comments | Bidirectional | Messages added in either tool appear in both | | Assignee | Jira → Yocoolab | Jira assignee visible in Yocoolab | | Priority | Jira → Yocoolab | Jira priority displayed on thread card | | PR Link | Yocoolab → Jira | Claude Code PR automatically linked to Jira ticket | Real Workflow Example Here's how a real team uses Yocoolab + Jira: Scenario: A reviewer finds a misaligned pricing card on the staging deployment. 1. Reviewer opens staging in Chrome, clicks the misaligned card, writes "Price alignment off on Pro card — should match the Enterprise card layout" 2. Yocoolab creates a thread with screenshot, CSS selector, and DOM context. Reviewer selects "Sync to Jira" 3. Jira gets a ticket in the "Design Review" project with title, description, and link back to the thread 4. Developer opens the Jira ticket, clicks the Yocoolab link, sees the screenshot and context. Clicks "Send to Claude" 5. Claude Code receives: CSS selector `.pricing-card.pro .price-amount`, computed styles `text-align: left`, source file `src/components/Pricing.tsx` line 156. Fixes alignment, creates PR linked to Jira ticket YC-427 6. Jira ticket auto-updates with PR link. Manager sees the fix in review. PR merges. Jira transitions to Done. Yocoolab thread resolves. Total time: 7 minutes. No manual ticket creation. No context hunting. No Slack pings. The Bottom Line Jira is your team's system of record. Design feedback should be in it. Yocoolab's Jira integration ensures every visual issue has a ticket, every ticket has full visual context, and Claude Code can fix issues automatically — all without leaving your existing workflow. Stop managing design feedback in three different tools. Bring it into Jira, automate the fixes, and ship faster. Connect Jira — Free Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free ## Figma vs Yocoolab: Why Dev Teams Are Moving Design Review to the Real Product — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/figma-vs-yocoolab-deep-dive Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog Product May 27, 2026 8 min read Figma vs Yocoolab: Why Dev Teams Are Moving Design Review to the Real Product By Yocoolab Team Share When Figma launched in 2016, it revolutionized design collaboration. A decade later, it's the industry standard — but cracks are showing. Dev teams are increasingly frustrated with canvas-based review and are moving their feedback workflow to the live product instead. This deep dive compares Figma and Yocoolab head-to-head — not as design tools, but as design-review platforms for engineering teams . Figma: The Good, The Bad, The Expensive What Figma Gets Right Figma democratized design. Real-time collaboration, browser-based editing, and an extensive plugin ecosystem made it the default choice for design teams worldwide. For creating mockups, wireframes, and prototypes, it's excellent. Where Figma Falls Short for Dev Teams The moment design leaves the canvas and enters development, Figma's value drops precipitously: 1. The Canvas-Reality Gap Figma shows you a static mockup. The deployed app shows you the real thing — with real data, responsive breakpoints, hover states, loading spinners, and edge cases. Issues that are invisible on a canvas become obvious on the live product. 2. Developer Context Is Missing When a reviewer says "fix the padding on this button," the developer has to: • Find which button in a sea of Figma layers • Map it to the actual code component • Determine the CSS selector, DOM path, and framework context • Then finally write the fix Yocoolab captures all of this automatically: screenshot, CSS selector, DOM path, computed styles, framework type, and source file location — all attached to the comment with zero manual work. 3. The Tool Multiplier Problem Figma adds to your tool count, not reduces it. A typical workflow: Figma → Slack (discuss) → Jira (ticket) → GitHub (PR). That's four tools for one piece of feedback. Yocoolab consolidates: comment on the live app → Claude Code generates the fix → PR auto-created → everyone notified. 4. Viewer Seat Fees Figma charges per editor, and viewer-restricted seats cost extra too — so you end up paying just for people who need to VIEW designs. Yocoolab charges zero for viewers, and it's free in beta for your whole team: unlimited users and unlimited repos, with no per-seat fees. The Yocoolab Difference: Review on the Real Product Yocoolab isn't a Figma replacement — it's the missing piece that connects design intent to shipped code. Here's the side-by-side: | Feature | Figma | Yocoolab | |---------|-------|----------| | Design creation | ✅ Industry-leading | ❌ Not a design tool | | Comment on live apps | ❌ Canvas only | ✅ Any URL (localhost, staging, prod) | | Auto-capture element context | ❌ | ✅ CSS selector, DOM, framework, source | | AI code generation from feedback | ❌ (manual handoff) | ✅ Claude Code integration | | Real rendering verification | ❌ | ✅ See the real thing | | Viewer pricing | $3-15/seat/month | $0/viewer | | Dev tool integrations | Limited | Jira, Linear, Slack, Telegram, GitHub, Pendo | | Extension users per team | N/A | Unlimited — free | Who Should Use Each Tool? Use Figma when: • You're creating designs from scratch • You need vector editing and prototyping • Your team is design-heavy and engineering-light Use Yocoolab when: • You're reviewing implemented designs on the real product • You want feedback to go directly to developers (with code context) • You want Claude Code to generate fixes from feedback • You're tired of paying for viewer seats just to let developers see designs • You want one tool instead of Figma + Slack + Jira + GitHub The ideal stack: Figma for design creation → deploy → Yocoolab for review and iteration. They're complementary, not competitive. The Cost Comparison Here's what a 15-person team (3 designers, 7 developers, 5 stakeholders) pays: | | Figma Professional | Yocoolab | |---|---|---| | 3 designers | $45/mo (editors) | $0 (free) | | 7 developers | $105/mo (dev mode) | $0 (free) | | 5 stakeholders | $25/mo (viewer-restricted) | $0 (free) | | Total | $175/month | $0 | That's a 100% cost reduction — and you get AI-powered code generation that Figma doesn't offer. The Bottom Line Figma is a world-class design tool. Yocoolab is a world-class design-review tool. They solve different problems. But if your team is spending more time reviewing implemented designs than creating new ones, you're paying Figma prices for a workflow that Yocoolab handles better — for a fraction of the cost. Stop reviewing on a fake canvas. Start reviewing on the real product. Try Yocoolab Free — No Seat Fees Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free ## Why Figma's Viewer Seat Pricing Is Costing Your Team Thousands — and the Alternative — Yocoolab Blog URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog/figma-viewer-seat-pricing-alternative Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ← Back to blog Product May 28, 2026 7 min read Why Figma's Viewer Seat Pricing Is Costing Your Team Thousands — and the Alternative By Yocoolab Team Share Figma's pricing model has a hidden cost that most teams don't notice until it's too late: viewer seats. Every developer, PM, stakeholder, and client who needs to see designs costs $15-25/month — even if they never touch the canvas. For a mid-size engineering team of 20 developers, that's $300-500/month just so developers can see design specs. Over a year: $3,600-6,000 . For an enterprise team of 100+ developers, you're looking at $18,000-30,000/year — for view-only access. There's a better way. Here's how teams are eliminating viewer seat costs entirely while getting better design feedback in the process. The Figma Viewer Seat Trap Figma charges per editor — and per viewer. The pricing looks like: | Plan | Editor Seat | Viewer Seat | |------|-------------|-------------| | Professional | $15/mo | $15/mo (unlimited) | | Organization | $25/mo | $25/mo (unlimited) | | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | On the surface, it seems reasonable. But here's the trap: every developer who needs to see design specs is a viewer . Every PM who needs to reference mockups is a viewer. Every stakeholder who wants to see what's being built is a viewer. In practice, a 5-designer team with 25 developers and 10 PMs/stakeholders would pay: • Figma Pro : 5 × $15 = $75/mo for designers + 35 viewer seats = $525/mo → $600/mo total • Annual cost : $7,200 That's $7,200/year just so developers can see what they're building. And that doesn't include the cost of context switching between Figma and their IDE. Why Viewing Designs on a Canvas Is the Wrong Model The fundamental problem isn't just pricing — it's the model itself. Developers don't need to "view designs on a canvas." They need to understand what the product should look like and do — on the actual product . When a developer opens Figma to check a design spec, they're: 1. Leaving the context of their IDE and the actual app 2. Looking at a static mockup that may not match the deployed state 3. Manually translating pixel values to CSS (introducing errors) 4. Missing interactions, states, and edge cases that only appear on the real product The viewer seat model charges you for this broken workflow — and then charges you more as your team grows. The Alternative: Review on the Real Product Yocoolab takes the opposite approach. Instead of bringing developers to a canvas, it brings design feedback to the product: Every viewer is free in beta. There are no viewer seats in Yocoolab — and no per-seat charges at all. Developers, PMs, stakeholders, and clients all use it free. The whole app is free in beta, so there is nothing to meter by user. A team of 5 designers/reviewers using Yocoolab would pay: $0. The full app — unlimited threads, unlimited users and teams, and every integration (Jira, Linear, Slack, GitHub, Telegram, Claude Code) — is free in beta. New advanced features may later be offered as optional paid add-ons, but everything here is included free. That's free for the entire team — vs $600/month for Figma. And developers get more context, not less. What Developers Actually Get When a reviewer pins feedback on the real product using Yocoolab, developers get: 1. The exact element — CSS selector, computed styles, and source file location 2. A screenshot with annotation — showing exactly what needs to change 3. The full page context — URL, viewport, browser state 4. Threaded discussion — all feedback in one place, linked to the element 5. Claude Code integration — send the element to Claude for an automatic fix and PR Compare this to Figma's developer handoff: pixel values, spacing tokens, and color codes — without any connection to the actual codebase. Real Cost Comparison: 25-Developer Team | Item | Figma (Pro) | Yocoolab | |------|-------------|----------| | Designer seats (5) | $75/mo | N/A | | Developer seats (25) | $375/mo | $0 (free) | | PM/Stakeholder seats (10) | $150/mo | $0 (free) | | Active reviewers | N/A | $0 (free) | | Monthly total | $600/mo | $0 | | Annual savings | — | $7,200/year | That's a 100% reduction in tooling cost — and developers get element-level context instead of static design specs. The Hidden Cost: Developer Context Switching The seat cost is visible on your Figma invoice. The context-switching cost isn't — but it's often larger. Every time a developer switches from their IDE to Figma to check a design spec, research shows it takes 23 minutes to regain full focus. If a developer checks Figma just 4 times per day: • 4 context switches × 23 minutes = 92 minutes lost per developer per day • Across 25 developers: 38 hours lost per day • That's nearly 5 full-time employees worth of productivity — lost to context switching At an average developer salary of $150,000/year, that's $750,000/year in lost productivity — dwarfing the seat costs. How Teams Are Migrating Teams moving from Figma-only review to Yocoolab typically follow this pattern: 1. Week 1 : Install the Chrome Extension. Keep using Figma for initial design work. 2. Week 2 : Start pinning review feedback on the deployed app instead of Figma comments. 3. Week 3 : Developers notice they're getting better context and spending less time in Figma. 4. Week 4 : Reduce Figma viewer seats. Developers now reference real-product feedback instead of design specs. The key insight: you don't need to leave Figma entirely. Keep it for initial design work. Use Yocoolab for the review and handoff — where the real costs accumulate. The Bottom Line Figma's viewer seat model made sense when design review happened on a canvas. But modern teams review on the real product — and paying $15-25/month per developer for view-only access to static mockups is a tax on your team's productivity, not an investment in it. Yocoolab eliminates viewer seat costs entirely. Your developers, PMs, and stakeholders can see, comment on, and interact with design feedback — all for free in beta. Install Free — Zero Viewer Seat Costs Ready to cut your review time in half? Install the Yocoolab Chrome Extension and start reviewing on the real product in under a minute. Get Started Free See how we compare to Figma → Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. Ready to ship faster? Install the Chrome Extension in 60 seconds — free. Get Started Free # Product and policy ## Blog — Design Review, AI Agents and Shipping Faster — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/blog Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Blog How Yocoolab works Honest, practical guides on reviewing the real product, routing feedback to your tools, and shipping the fix faster. Product June 2026 6 min read What Is Live-Product Review? Instead of commenting on a static canvas or pasting screenshots into Slack, your team comments directly on the running app — localhost, staging, or production. Each comment captures the element, the page, and a screenshot, so whoever picks it up has the real context. Here's how it works and why it beats the screenshot-and-Slack loop. Read article Guides June 2026 5 min read Getting Started: Install Yocoolab and Leave Your First Comment Get up and running in a few minutes: install the Chrome extension, open your live app, drop a pinned comment on any element, and invite your team. Viewing needs no account, and it’s free in beta for everyone on the team. Read article Product June 2026 6 min read From a Pinned Comment to a Pull Request with Claude Code Pin a comment on the live app, then route it to Claude Code. It receives the element, the screenshot, and the surrounding context, works in your repo, and opens a pull request linked back to the thread. Here’s the full loop from feedback to PR. Read article Integrations June 2026 6 min read How Feedback Flows Into Jira, Linear, Slack, and Telegram Send a pinned comment straight to Jira or Linear with the screenshot and element context attached, and let Slack and Telegram get the updates as the thread moves. Here’s how feedback travels from the live app into the tools your team already uses. Read article Product June 2026 7 min read Figma and Yocoolab: Where Each One Fits Figma is where designs are made. Yocoolab is where you review the real, running product. An honest look at where each tool fits — and why commenting on the live app (free, with no per-seat fees) closes the gap between a static mockup and what actually shipped. Read article Pricing June 2026 5 min read Why Yocoolab Is Free in Beta — and Has No Viewer Seat Fees Per-seat tools get expensive fast when stakeholders only need to view and comment. Yocoolab is free in beta — unlimited users, unlimited repos, every viewer included. An honest look at where seat fees come from and what a no-seat-fee model changes about who you can include. Read article Start collaborating on the real product Install the extension, invite your team, and leave your first comment on your live app today. Free in beta. Get Started Free Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Own Your Agent — No AI Vendor Lock-In — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/own-your-agent Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard ✦ For the open-source community Own your agent. Don't rent your workflow. The big AI labs are wiring their design and review tools straight into their products — so your workflow lives on their model, at their price. Yocoolab is built the other way: pin feedback on any live page and send it to whatever agent you want over the open Model Context Protocol. Your feedback, your agent, your model. Bring your own agent Or sign in to dashboard → The lock-in nobody names Every design, review, and feedback tool a lab bakes into its own product is a hook. It looks like convenience. It isn't neutral. The more of your workflow lives inside their walls, the more of their tokens you burn — on their model, at their price — whether or not it's the best, safest, or cheapest choice for the job in front of you. At today's API prices, that compounds. You stop picking the right model for the task and start defaulting to whichever one your tools happen to live in. Your context, your review loop, your code — all pooled inside one vendor's roadmap and one vendor's invoice. Open by design Yocoolab talks to your agent over the Model Context Protocol — an open standard, not a private API. You pin feedback on a live page and route it to Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, or a model running on your own hardware. The tool doesn't care whose model answers. You do. Nothing is welded shut. Swap agents when a better one ships. Point it at a local endpoint when you want your code to stay on machines you control. The feedback layer stays the same; the intelligence behind it is always your call. Local AI is real now Open-weight models, run with the right hardware and an agentic harness, already do serious work — and the gap to the frontier is closing fast. There is a growing, sane case for keeping your agent, your context, and your code on infrastructure you actually own: cheaper, more private, and free of any single lab's pricing or roadmap. Software should let you do the work without being tied to one lab's meter. That's the bet the open-source community has always made — and it's the one Yocoolab is built for. Your feedback. Your agent. Your model. Your call. Pin feedback on the real product and send it to whatever intelligence you choose — no lock-in, no seat tax on the people leaving the feedback. Free while in beta. Bring your own agent Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Onboarding Guide — Set Up, Pin Feedback, Ship — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/guide Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Onboarding guide From sign-up to shipped in your first ten minutes Set up your workspace, pin feedback on your live app, and hand the work to your agent. Four short steps — with the real screens you’ll see. Add to Chrome Open the dashboard 01 Get set up Set up your workspace Your whole team, one workspace. Create it, add the app you want feedback on, and invite the people who’ll weigh in. 1 Create your workspace Name your organization and you are in. Everyone you invite shares it. 2 Add a project and its links Create a project, then add the URLs you want feedback on. No GitHub required. 3 Invite your team Invite collaborators by email. Everyone can comment and react — free. 02 Leave feedback in context Pin a comment on the real thing Open Yocoolab on your live app and click the exact element. The screenshot, the element and the page context are captured for you — no repro steps, no “which button?”. Hit Pin comment, then click the element you mean. Write what you want changed and post it. Every thread lands in Work for your team to triage. 03 Brief your agent visually Turn a sketch into a visual brief Draw the change on the screenshot and a small local model turns it into HTML — with your design system tokens imported. This isn’t shipped code: it’s a visual brief your coding agent reads to see the intended look, so it reaches for the right components from your design system, or builds new ones that fit. Sketch the change; your design system tokens go into the generation. A small local model — a 12B like Gemma is plenty — renders the intent as HTML, on your machine. Your larger agent reads it as a spec — reusing the right components, not pasting the HTML. 04 Hand it off Send the work to your agent The whole thread — element, screenshot and context — is ready for your coding agent. Paste it in, send it straight through, or let a scheduled agent pick it up and ship it. Copy thread text into Claude Code, Cursor or any agent. Or pick your agent and hit Build to send it through Yocoolab. Or set up a cron agent to grab new threads and open the PRs for you. Point at it. Ship it. Install the extension, pin your first comment, and send it to your agent. Free for your whole team, in beta. Add to Chrome Open the dashboard Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## FAQ — How Yocoolab Works — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/faq Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Frequently Asked Questions Everything you need to know about Yocoolab From pricing to integrations, security to setup — answers to the most common questions from teams switching from Figma to live-product design review. Pricing & Plans How much does Yocoolab cost? Yocoolab is free in beta. The full app — unlimited projects and links, unlimited users and teams, every integration (Jira, Linear, Slack, GitHub, Telegram, Pendo), Claude Code AI, and element-to-source mapping — costs nothing. There is no credit card, no trial clock, and no seat fees. Pricing after beta has not been set yet. We will give clear notice well before anything changes. Do you charge for viewer seats like Figma? Is there a free trial? What happens when beta ends? Getting Started How do I install Yocoolab on my site? Does it work with any tech stack? Can I use Yocoolab on localhost? How long does setup take? Integrations What integrations does Yocoolab support? How does the Claude Code integration work? Can I connect multiple Jira projects? Does the Slack integration support channels? Security & Compliance Is my data secure? Do you support SSO? Where is my data stored? Do you have a SOC 2 report? Technical & Support Does Yocoolab work on mobile? What browsers are supported? What kind of support do you offer? Can I export my data? Still have questions? Yocoolab is free in beta — no credit card, no trial clock. Or reach out and we will answer anything. Get Started Free Contact Support Ready to cut your design review time in half? Join teams shipping faster with live-product feedback. No viewer seat fees. Start in 60 seconds. Get Started Free See Figma Comparison Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Privacy Policy — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/privacy Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Back to home Privacy Policy Last updated: March 2, 2026 Yocoolab is operated by Attune LLC ("we", "us", "our"). This policy describes how the Yocoolab Chrome extension and web platform collect, use, and protect your information. 1. What We Collect Account Information When you sign in with GitHub or Google, we receive your display name, email address, and avatar URL from the OAuth provider. We store these to identify you within comment threads. Authentication Tokens OAuth access tokens are encrypted at rest using AES-256-GCM. A short-lived JWT session token is stored in your browser's local storage to keep you signed in. Comment & Thread Data When you create a comment, we store the message text, a screenshot of the annotated area, the CSS selector and element tag of the target element, page URL, viewport dimensions, and git branch name. This data is necessary to pin comments to the correct location. Click Position & Element Context When you pin a comment, we record the click coordinates and surrounding DOM context (CSS selector path, element tag, computed styles) so the comment marker can be placed accurately on return visits. Claude Code & MCP Integration Yocoolab integrates with Claude Code via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). When you send a feedback thread "To Claude," the thread content — message text, screenshot, element context, and page URL — is shared with your local Claude Code session through a localhost bridge ( 127.0.0.1:9800 ). This data stays on your machine and is not routed through Yocoolab servers. The AI Companion chat panel also communicates through this local bridge for real-time conversation with Claude Code. Extension Preferences UI preferences — panel position, theme (light/dark), accent color, enabled/disabled state, and server mode — are stored locally via chrome.storage.local and are never sent to our servers. 2. How We Use Your Data Display your name and avatar on comments you author Pin comment markers to the correct page elements Deliver real-time notifications when teammates reply Associate threads with git repositories and branches Generate dashboard statistics (open/resolved counts, activity feeds) Send thread context to your local Claude Code session when you use "Send to Claude" or the AI Companion 3. Data We Do NOT Collect We do not track your browsing history or the pages you visit We do not log keystrokes, mouse movements, or form input We do not collect financial, health, or location data We do not inject ads or tracking pixels 4. Third-Party Services We use the following third-party services, each governed by their own privacy policies: GitHub OAuth — for authentication Google OAuth — for authentication Railway / Replit — for backend hosting PostgreSQL — for database storage Anthropic Claude (via MCP) — for AI-assisted code fixes. Thread context is sent to your local Claude Code session over localhost; data sent to Anthropic's API is governed by Anthropic's Privacy Policy We do not sell, rent, or share your personal data with third parties for advertising or marketing purposes. 5. Data Storage & Security All API traffic is encrypted via HTTPS (TLS 1.2+) OAuth tokens are encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM Database access is restricted to authenticated backend services Role-based access control (admin/write/read) governs per-repository permissions API requests are rate-limited (100 requests per 15 minutes in production) 6. Data Retention Comment threads and messages are retained for as long as your account is active. You can delete individual threads from the extension UI. If you delete your account, all associated data is permanently removed within 30 days. 7. Your Rights You can: Export your data by contacting us Delete your threads and comments from the extension Revoke OAuth access from your GitHub or Google account settings Request full account deletion by emailing us 8. Children's Privacy Yocoolab is not directed at children under 13. We do not knowingly collect information from children under 13. 9. Changes to This Policy We may update this policy from time to time. Material changes will be communicated via the extension or email. Continued use after changes constitutes acceptance. 10. Contact For privacy questions or data requests, contact us at support@yocoolab.com . Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved. ## Terms of Service — Yocoolab URL: https://yocoolab.com/terms Yocoolab Features Demo Pricing Docs Blog Compare Dashboard Sign Up Free Add to Chrome Dashboard Back to home Terms of Service Last updated: March 2, 2026 These Terms of Service ("Terms") govern your use of Yocoolab, including the Chrome extension, web platform, MCP server, and API (collectively, the "Service"), operated by Attune LLC ("we", "us", "our"). By using the Service, you agree to these Terms. 1. Eligibility You must be at least 13 years old to use the Service. If you are using the Service on behalf of an organization, you represent that you have authority to bind that organization to these Terms. 2. Account & Authentication You sign in via GitHub or Google OAuth. You are responsible for maintaining the security of your account credentials and for all activity under your account. You agree to notify us promptly if you suspect unauthorized access. 3. Acceptable Use You agree not to: Use the Service for any unlawful purpose or in violation of any applicable laws Attempt to gain unauthorized access to other users' accounts, threads, or data Interfere with or disrupt the Service, servers, or networks Reverse-engineer, decompile, or disassemble any part of the Service Use automated scripts to access the Service beyond normal API usage Upload malicious code, viruses, or harmful content through comments or screenshots Impersonate another person or misrepresent your affiliation with an organization 4. Your Content "Your Content" includes comment threads, messages, screenshots, and element context data you create through the Service. You retain ownership of Your Content. By using the Service, you grant us a limited license to store, display, and transmit Your Content as necessary to operate the Service (e.g., showing your comments to collaborators, sending notifications, syncing with integrated tools). You are responsible for ensuring Your Content does not violate the rights of others or contain confidential information you are not authorized to share. 5. Claude Code & MCP Integration The Service integrates with Claude Code via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). When you send a thread "To Claude" or use the AI Companion, thread context is transmitted to your local Claude Code session over localhost. The AI processing is performed by Anthropic's Claude and is subject to Anthropic's Terms of Service . We are not responsible for the output, accuracy, or actions taken by Claude Code based on thread context sent from the Service. You are responsible for reviewing any code changes, pull requests, or suggestions generated through this integration before deploying them. 6. Integrations The Service connects with third-party platforms including GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, and Telegram. Your use of these integrations is subject to the respective third-party terms. We are not responsible for the availability, accuracy, or conduct of third-party services. 7. Plans & Billing The Service offers free and paid plans. Paid plans are billed through your organization's subscription. Features, limits, and pricing are described on our pricing page . We reserve the right to change pricing with 30 days' notice. Cancellation takes effect at the end of the current billing period. 8. Service Availability We strive to maintain high availability but do not guarantee uninterrupted access. The Service is provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. We may perform maintenance, updates, or modifications that temporarily affect availability. 9. Limitation of Liability To the maximum extent permitted by law, Attune LLC shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, or any loss of profits, data, or goodwill, arising from your use of the Service. Our total liability for any claim related to the Service shall not exceed the amount you paid us in the 12 months preceding the claim. 10. Termination You may stop using the Service at any time. We may suspend or terminate your access if you violate these Terms. Upon termination, your right to use the Service ceases immediately. We will delete your data in accordance with our Privacy Policy . 11. Changes to These Terms We may update these Terms from time to time. Material changes will be communicated via the Service or email at least 14 days before taking effect. Continued use after changes constitutes acceptance. 12. Governing Law These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, without regard to conflict of law principles. Any disputes shall be resolved in the courts located in Delaware. 13. Contact For questions about these Terms, contact us at support@yocoolab.com . Yocoolab Contextual feedback for live web apps. By Attune LLC. Product Features Demo Pricing Chrome Extension Firefox Add-on Edge Extension Figma Alternative Resources Onboarding Guide Documentation Blog FAQ Jira Integration Linear Integration Slack Integration Telegram Integration GitHub Company Contact Privacy Policy Terms of Service © 2026 Attune LLC. All rights reserved.